drsensible3
DrSensible3
drsensible3

There were actual in-universe reasons they couldn’t be:

Han had to use a Tauntaun to find Luke when he went missing, and couldn’t use the Snowspeeder because they had trouble adjusting them to Hoth’s incredibly cold (and wet) temperatures. They were able to make the proper adjustments to them (finally) that allowed

Let me break it down for you since you don’t seem to be able to get it:

Imp commented about the Empire being able to use something that the movie indicated they could not.
I commented about other items being available for use that the movie indicated were not available.
You replied that two people who were involved in

That would be great! But we shouldn’t have them operating the controls on the Death Star, as humorous as that might be. That’s all I’m saying...

Right, so we can criticize that. I’m more concerned with equipment being right than a skin issue which may be fixed by launch time.

WHAT??? Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker didn’t duel in the middle of Hoth? You’ve got to be kidding me! Thank you for providing a reply that has absolutely nothing to do with my comment! Imagine getting spawned as Dak! You have to die every single time!

What I said is that we should have the elements available in the

I was bitching before, and I’m bitching a bit now, but they’ve shown things that specifically address some concerns people had that weren’t being mentioned.

Vader was shown during the assault on the Rebel Base, so it’s not inconceivable that he could be burning through the trenches. And I don’t have a problem with Luke being there (even in his RotJ outfit) because he was there. If there is a Jabba the Hutt hero... not so much. A dianoga shouldn’t reach out from under the

Not only that, but there were no TIE Fighters or X-wings involved in the battle. If we’re not going to keep it to fit the actual conditions represented in the battle it takes away a bit of the “umph” for me. Empire has AT-ATs and AT-STs, Rebels have Snowspeeders and Tauntauns... why can’t we keep it that way?

Except even there we’re losing ground. Madden 15 went from 6 player co-op to 4 player co-op, and you can’t do co-op in an online league (a source of major frustration to my family and I, who were setting up a league there for when Fantasy Football was over). Consoles are expensive, and a lot of the time you want to

Well, considering you didn’t answer any of my questions I’ll hold off on answering yours. What I will quickly say is that the world has faced “destruction level events” before, and yet the world still exists. Clearly, Superman has found a way to stop many of the threats int he past without killing them. I never said

Well, sort of. Believe me, I’m pro-death penalty and have my conceal carry license. I have no problem killing should the situation call for it, and have no qualms with emptying out prisons a bit through some culling. So please don’t misconstrue my meaning to be that I believe that all killing is wrong. However,

First off, Batman has told people to hold off using guns in his presence a number of times, or just to use it only in the most extreme circumstances. Secondly, there have been a ton on media dedicated to parallel Supermen with the same upbringing where Superman has killed and refused to stop. Justice Lord Superman is

Throwing it to nostalgia or fanboyism may be easier for you, but it doesn’t address the actual situation. So, in an attempt to get through to you again, I point to another Bruce Timm produced affair with “Under the Red Hood”. I’ll do you a favor and bring up specific quotes this time:

The suggestion that Superman is anything like Superboy Prime is as silly as saying he’s comparable to Ultraman or the Red Son of Kyrpton. They’re completely different characters from different realities, each of whom had experiences create the person that they are. And having Superman kill someone is far more for

If you read what I wrote previously, you should know that I don’t see Superman as simply a symbol. I’m saying that his most important role in the DCAU is as a symbol. Sure, you can have him kill for shock value, but it’s as meaningless as fridging a character or showing the death of a Superhero. Take a look at “What’s

And I have the greatest respect for Bruce Timm and the truly fantastic work he did on the DCU. I do not, however, believe that any creator is infallible (George Lucas is proof of this). Even Joss Whedon, a man whose work I’ve mostly coveted as some of the best fiction in recent memory, has clear soft spots and

I think it’s an important line not to cross though. Superman can be prepared to kill, or even eventually come to realize the necessity of it, but I think Batman or any other Justice Leaguer should stop in and commit the murder before Superman can. The point isn’t that Superman wouldn’t ever kill, because that’s

Let’s all get this straight right now: a public shaming for a rational person is not reason enough to justify suicide. Therefore, the girl was suffering from either one or multiple disorders that caused her to commit suicide. Did this help? Probably not. But to link this as a direct cause for her suicide is silly and

Well... it’s a damned if you do, damned if you don’t type of thing. Most trailers that are released come with a statement like “This is pre-alpha footage!” or “Rendered using in-game engine” or “as will appear on Xbox One/PS4”. Without that reference, the graphics look... more claymationy than even Fallout 3 and

The language you used and the subject of your response was both agressive and dismissive, like “damn job” and the claim that butt divers don’t get a pat on the back for their work.

I agree is was a bad joke (I hope I was clear with my quotations around the joke in my reply to you), but it wasn’t the type of bad joke