drktrvlr
Dark Traveler
drktrvlr

I find most dress codes to be offensive, either to a gender or socioeconomic status. I disregard 99% of them.

Absolutely. Also, wrap your child in a tight cocoon of plastic wrap before going outside.

safety based is hilarious, because if some dude sees too much of your ankle hes going to fly off rape you.

Thank God I’m paranoid. Turned off search history and deleted all shit long time ago. Can’t help but think that it is still being saved somewhere.

If i want a product, i’ll find it myself. I dont need a bot watching everything i do and telling me what to like. You can be targeted by identity thieves all you want.... just wait until google fucks up with their security and your name, address, credit card, bank account, and every search you have ever done end up

The Soviets deleted religion...and managed to be an oppressive evil empire all the same.

But if I delete my Google history, how will Google be able to tell me what I want before I realized I wanted it?

So this is an iPhone 7 rumor right?

Further, I think you meant to type "elicit." "Illicit" is an adjective, meaning forbidden.

Well, actually, this guy actually asked a yes/no question, actually.

"Can you talk about this win against Arizona today?"

"Yeah."

Exactly the answer that kind of question deserves.

I don't know about you or any of the reporters involved, but I'd feel like a real jerk asking inane football questions (and all of those questions were indeed inane) the week after the guy was willing to to pay $100,000 specifically to NOT speak to reporters.

You're an asshole for thinking he is an asshole.

Maybe they should take a hint and realize that someone making millions of dollars a year doesn't give a shit about any fines received from not answering questions.

Reporter: Marshawn, do you feel dehumanized? Treated like property?

Answering every question with a "yeah" is what got me fired from my job as a suicide hotline operator.

You and me have very different reactions to this one. Might as well be published in 1000 years as far as I cur. Aren't there enough Atwood books available in our time that I'm already not going to read? Is a rhetorical question I might ask myself.

I feel like most parents would agree that their children cause them to age prematurely.

I have a feeling that this article is going to be a very depressing read 20-40 years from now.