Perhaps they want to attract viewers over 40?

It’s always looked to me like when something red fades over many years into a pale pink.

How has literally nothing happened with the actual crime this season is based on??? Episode One has scientists disappear then reappear dead in an ice cube, and literally nothing has advanced about the crime in 4 episodes.

Yeah. It’s the only modern rental store. All movies in existence are either included or can be rented for 1.99-4.99

This dude had his chamber full and cocked ready to blast anyone who dared insult the Crisp Ratt

I’m currently working on a multi-year documentary called “How Not to Have Sex”

I believe the racial aspect is how people call it “fried rice syndrome” even though there’s no specific connection to Asian takeout rice. ALL leftover rice grows this microbe.

It’ll be fine if you just stick to normal rules of leftovers on the lower end of the spectrum. ~3 days max, and reheat *fully*

I agree with you that it’s riskier than implied. Sure, when it finally comes out, if there is a good nostalgia marketing campaign, it could make 180m at the box office. No guarantee.

Where is it illegal by state law to photoshop fake nudes of adults?

Did the research microorganisms also cause Fiona Shaw to see her dead husband several times over the years? Or for the dude in the hospital to defy his health condition briefly and know things about Navarro?

Traditionally speaking you are probably right, that he isn’t even feminist in any way, so also isn’t really a TERF vs a regular reactionary transphobe. But he once declared himself “team TERF’ on stage, so the moniker is self chosen.

It’s very legally different by not involving real images and a personal connection that makes the suspect obvious.

simply banning the combinations of “person and nude”

Activist Group Fools Journalists With AI Hoax Criticizing Toyota’s Anti-EV Views

Nah, Moriarty went completely Leopard Woman. Like, she is a totally different human and it will affect her tv show The Boys it’s so bad.

Nothing you said is legally correct though. Fake celebrity nudes are legal free speech (that has existed for decades), whether they were made in crayon or sophisticated software. Also, platforms have almost no liability for user content.

They have incredibly strong liability protection from user content under Section 230

You’re a dangerous moron and a tool of Republicans