There’s a certain blind loyalty to CDPR that has been around for almost a decade, but still manages to keep surprising me. Just this sense of ‘CDPR can do no wrong and just wait for this to become that masterpiece’.

Frankly astonished by some of the responses here dismissing this as stuff they “already knew” or that it’s unnecessary. How brainwashed are you that your first response to a report about CDPR treating their people like shit is “eh, I already knew that”? How can it be anything but good that these assholes are getting…

TBH I hope they don’t- their idiocy is a thrill every post they spam, and it’s absolutely hilarious that anybody cares as much as Eustis does about all our inane hot takes in a small section of the web.

Dude’s fucking dumb.

Do you really need a wall of text to say you don’t think people shouldn’t be held accountable for their actions?

Look. I get it.   You don't believe in holding bigots accountable. That's cool. But some of us do

Bold of you to assume I didn’t read your comment.

A whole lot of words for "I don't believe in holding bigots accountable"

If you have shitty views, why does it always seem to be so important that they be expressed, out loud, on the internet, for all to see?

And the also seem to have a deeply weird hard-on for extrajudicial killings on the part of agents of the state. Crazy, huh?

Never, ever complain about a product or service. Ever. Because that loaf of bread you bought this week? The machine it was made in was once used to bake bread for the CCP. HAH! SUCK it!

Libertarians are crazy, yo. They talk big about free market, except when the market turns on them.

To be perfectly honest, his argument seems to be that I should be forced to buy this game against my will because there is no ethical consumption under capitalism.

And yet, no part of what you just typed changes the fact that I can buy what I want in a free market. Which is the entire point of the discussion as it pertains to Laserface up there.

Why can’t you buy it? Do you have a copy of Rowling’s payment contract in front of you? How do you know she didn’t get paid a flat licensing fee up front and makes no money off the back-end sales? If that’s the case, than the only people hurt if you don’t buy the game are the developers.

“We’re really, REALLY trying to tighten up the code to ensure that the bathrooms remain rigidly segregated along gender lines. We know that kids loitering in bathrooms is a key component of Ms. Rowling’s vision, and vital to the sense of joy and whimsy that this property brings to audiences worldwide.”

In before all the assholes coming in to defend Joan Rowling for being a transphobe and exclaim “Cancel Culture!” when people point out that what she’s doing is transphiobic and that they don’t wish to consume art that Joan makes a profit off of.

Good, don’t mess it up. For a source material as rich as HP, its best game over the past 20(!) years shouldn't be a Lego game (although it is the best Lego game).

This came out of a Virginia field office which basically means that FBI HQ didn’t even look at it. Anything that works it way up from field usually gets passed around until someone higher up decides to take credit for it.

Ah yes, let’s not anger the group that: