People that want to be called adults are petitioning a 20 year old man to personally apologize to them for closing a video game prematurely and hurling kindergarten insults at him to capitulate. He will fit right in with the "grown men".
People that want to be called adults are petitioning a 20 year old man to personally apologize to them for closing a video game prematurely and hurling kindergarten insults at him to capitulate. He will fit right in with the "grown men".
“In any other serious sport that would basically ban you for quite a time”
Maybe I’m too old to understand why a 20 year old has to apologize to the world for disconnecting from a video game. People take this stuff so seriously.
Lol now your just spamming random questions. I get it, you think the description isn’t misleading, I think it is. There’s nothing left to talk about.
Haha... so its suggesting people make architecture materials presentations to their friends and family. Hilarious.
“... ready to be used in your designs, presentations, or comps, as backgrounds or for general visual information”
I’m not making a legal case, I’m just offering an empathic perspective based on my own experience on may have happened. Im not stating a fact. Artists don’t know image copyright law all the time and the amazon description is completely misleading, who knows if the 1996 book was also falsely advertising that you could…
I am a professional artist, and I constantly run into professionals that don’t understand the difference between royalty free, rights managed, editorial use only, etc.
They aren't real, it's just ones and zeros on a completely indifferent silicon chip
Agreed, it doesn’t, I would personally have double/triple checked. But the description is very misleading
There are tons of images from CDs like this that can be used commercially without a license. Most of the Mario 64 images are royalty free images that come from a 3D software package, I think maya (edit: it's Alias/3 by Autodesk). So I know this isn’t true.
Yeah, for sure, I’m not arguing the legal case, just putting myself in the shoes of a artist in the late 90s. There were lots of books and CDs like this that let you use the images and the amazon description makes it seem like it’s textures for commercial use, when it fact it’s just a CD of images you can’t use.
Yeah, I get that it isn’t supposed to be used commercially, but the book description doesn’t make that obvious at all.
To be fair to Capcom, even the current description of the book on Amazon makes it seem like you can use the images for commercial purposes and not be sued for millions of dollars. What is the point in this book / cd rom?
Wouldn’t it then be "they made a bisexual beat up heterosexuals"? I dunno, anything with violence seems to be a tough nut to crack for pride day.
I read the entire description of the wild and wacky event and it sounds so lame? He climbed in a hot tub with socks on, promoted his store, cracked an egg on his head and poured some cokecola in it... Why do 100,000 login for this.
Yes, jim was pretty out there, but it would have been worse without jim carrey.
You clearly want to talk and think about those topics, you actively try to get people to talk about them with you. Why not just accept you enjoy the confrontation and want more of it in your life. Personally enjoy arguing too, it's totally cool.
Think it’s more about capturing younger audiences, not so much retaining people that have been around since Far Cry 1. Lots of youngins won't care that nothing has changed for decades, they won't even know.
Developers should never have shrunk female video game characters boobs, ever since reviewers have tried to argue that every piece of video game content must also serve their preferred political agenda. They should just make whatever games they want.