That’s my thinking. Cars exist first and foremost to be driven. From the driver’s seat, it’s a fun car. Wrenching on it doesn’t seem to be too terrible. In the condition it’s in, 25 large is a NP.
When buying a classic like this it’s always worth to remember that it’s almost impossible to work on a project car and come out ahead when it comes to value. So always try to purchase the best example you can find, as it will retain its value better or even appreciate in price. Hence, this seems like a wonderful deal.…
I love this car precisely because it’s weird looking, not in spite of it. The only way it could be better is if it were painted British racing green or one of the John Player Specials. As for the panel gaps and general fit of the car, it’s a Lotus. They were not exactly known for that. If that’s something that bothers…
“I dont wanna have to watch it “
I have new appreciation for Tokyo Drift, they recognized the only thing Tiegen is remotely useful for in any kind of entertainment is her body/boobs. Not face, or voice, or acting skill.
If someone says “Cadillac” I don’t think of drifiting CTS-Vs, I think of 70s Coupe deVilles with cow horns on the hood, and the 2007 Escalade on chrome 22s. Aka, nothing but class!
What I don’t understand is that for my entire life (32 years), I’ve heard that saying that if something is the creme de la creme, it’s the Cadillac of something. Hearkening back to the illustrious 50s, 60s, and 70s.
So $7,000 for a 2002 Cadillac is a Nice Price for you? Okay...
Yuck. Audi is so boring.
Audi - same design but change the tail lights.
I appreciate your continued effort to prove you have terrible taste.
Sorry, what were you saying? I fell asleep after I looked at that picture.
The last time they went 6-> 8-Series they introduced a new platform with a V12 which replaced a dated 15 year old platform. This was back in 1990, btw.
Engine is almost entirely over the front axle, weight distribution must be way off, it putts out a lot of nasty smoke and does not run for long.