Hoepfully this gives them time to figure out where the color saturation slider is.

If it helps, they’re mostly weird, oily chuds who have decided to be half-assed nihilists because being a non-shitheaded human being is too lofty a concept.

Going down in a barrage of mocking from the opposing campaign is the only fitting end to this two-faced snake oil seller’s political career. Losing by double digits would be icing on the cake, since everyone knows the only reason he ran in PA was to avoid the epic thrashing he would have suffered in his actual state…

If he’s going to lose, he might as well do it as the shittiest possible version of himself.

What an asshole, cant be other to learn or understand the repercussions of his vote, but goes ahead and votes yes anyways. This country deserves better representation all around.

I’d love to revel in these assholes getting hoisted by their own petards, but that hoisting comes through the unnecessary suffering of lots of women and girls.  So all I can really do is say fuck all of these people, and if this were a truly functional society, powerful people like this asshole who cavalierly impose…

No one who has ever been married for any length of time would ever think this was a good idea.

This is the one reason I think these polling numbers will hold more than previously rosy ones for Democrats in the past. Unlike not wanting to admit they aren’t voting for someone like HRC (as though the poller is going to care), overturning Roe has direct and immediate consequences for many of these voters.

hey it caught me by surprise too, mainly because I never would have expected 4 SCOTUS justices to lie under oath before Congress so brazenly *without any consequences apparently* to overturn 50 years of precedent. I get that courts are allowed to overturn precedent when something (circumstances or the law) changes to…

!!! “Dems could have codified roe” is a both sideism talking point that ignores the political realities of 2009. Democrats never had 60 senators. They had 57 plus 2 independents. And at least two of the 59 were anti-choice. Couple that with a Republican Party that vowed to obstruct Obama every step of the way and a…

this dumb mf really put that shit in writing, huh. this asshole deserves to be criminally prosecuted.

Interestingly, the album also contains a rare solo collaboration written and performed by John, Paul and George, entitled “Shut The Fuck Up Ringo, You Talentless Big-Nosed Hack”.

I know fans like to construct unofficial Beatles albums using songs from their solo careers, and I’ve always imagined my own faux-Beatles album comprised of diss tracks they wrote about each other, like John Lennon’s “How Do You Sleep?”, Paul McCartney’s “Too Many People”, George Harrison’s “Wah-Wah”, and Ringo…

Ouch! I burned myself on your hot take!

The best part of this 10 year plan is that there doesn’t seem to be any “plan” involved. It’s just a bunch of general statements and buzzwords. If you break down what they said into an actual plan, they have nothing:

Wait, is that an option?  I’d like that.

Putting aside (for the moment) the astounding mess this guy is creating, it is baffling to me that these companies seem to be ignoring two key lessons from the MCU: be patient, and be fun. The original Iron Man was a big experiment, and it paid off, but people also had a chance to breath between that and Iron Man 2, an…

I’d be good with that. I love my wife, but I would have been just as happy if we were just “living in sin” without the marriage thing.

I’ve had several friends, where them and their spouse both wanted a divorce but were too poor to get one.  My husband helped one friend pay for his divorce.  Divorce isn’t something most couples take lightly.  

I’m not for this at all. The option of divorce, like marriage, should be an unalienable right. If this does end up happening, it is sure to have inverse consequences. People will think more deeply about the concept of marriage (even more than they do now) and draw the conclusion that there’s nothing wrong with just…