Because he's not just retweeting their tweets or anything like that. He goes out of his way to avoid giving credit to the actual creators of the jokes he "re-posts", and is now making lots of money leaching off of the work of others. And now that he is getting stuff like agency representation, book deals, TV deals…

You think that what he's doing constitutes him earning anything "based on his merit"? You are such a clueless fucking dolt. He's as talentless as you are witless.

Yeah, other than that I already knew of him as a joke plagiarist that most of the comedians I greatly admire and love seem to fucking hate, I admit that before reading this article I had not taken the time to actually learn much else about him. And I had never actually seen much of "his" stuff other than the…

You're both right! The Honeymooners originally started on Cavalcade of Stars, but then was carried over to The Jackie Gleason show when he moved to CBS. Then it was spun off into it's own show, but only lasted for one season on it's own before they brought back the Jackie Gleason Show and just made it a part of that…

Hired was broken up into two parts. Manos had Hired Part 2, and the more recent 2 DVD set of the Manos episode included a special feature where you could watch both parts together. I'd have to look it up to see which episode came before Manos and had part 1, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't Warrior of the Lost World.

The author of this article seems to have confused the concepts of "objectivity" and "neutrality". The news media today has done the same thing, and because of the crooked two party system that dominates our country they now see themselves as just a neutral entity between two opposing sides of every issue. Correcting…

Rock and/or Roll is a good one where each episode covers a different genre or theme (specific band episodes, "soundtrack songs", "Detroit bands", "local radio compilation albums" stuff like that), with a focus on the 1960's through early 1990's rock music, and playing stuff that isn't necessarily obscure (some of it…

I have a question that someone here might be able to answer. For some reason when I heard about a "secret Marvel TV series" being in development I thought about the X-Men. I know 20th Century Fox owns the rights to the X-Men for films, but do they also own the rights for television as well? Is it possible that…

Why would anyone expect her to be in the next one? Who would want to just see another story about all the same characters from Fury Road? It should be a new story about Max getting caught up in some different weird situation, like all the movies have been.

Actually since the way Tumblr works is that the posts at the bottom of the page are the oldest ones it's more like each strip gets progressively better. Like… well like no one I know of's discography.

If you bothered to click the link and actually read the comics (which takes about a minute since there are only like 20 of them and they take a couple seconds each to read) you'd see that there is a strip that is exactly just Hetfield bundled under his covers for two frames saying lines from One like how he's holding…

He's awesome in The Station Agent. He's equally awesome in Game of Thrones.

I wish I could just wish away my feelings… for this comment.

I take it back. You are a terrible person. Probably the kind of person who would sit quietly and watch a child die.

Yes, but that is when it's a genuine case of two people coming up with similar jokes independently of one another. It's always been like that in the comedy world. Any comedian who has any integrity at all would relent if they found themselves in a position where someone else had beat them to a joke. But that isn't…

When asswipes like these guys start trying to benefit professionally from the popularity they've cultivated by using other people's work they often crash and burn. I see from the Amazon ad under this article that this Josh "The Fat Jew" Ostrovsky a-hole has a book coming out in October. How the hell does someone…

Yeah it's people like you who really cause this problem. I'm not saying you are a bad person or knowingly doing anything wrong by following him, but if you don't understand why it's not right for him to repost other people's jokes without attributing them to their original sources then you are just helping this guy…

Yep. Because two people simultaneously but independently coming up with the same relatively obvious joke about a current event is the exact same thing as a person literally just reposting someone else's photo with the exact same wording for the joke.

I did indeed say "I don't think it's okay for someone to be a racist just because they've successfully been able to hide that fact from me." and I guess I can break that down for you if you are actually having that much difficulty understanding what that simple sentence means (and not just intentionally…

Well for one thing racism is not an "opinion", but firstly, I never said that "it's 'not okay' for someone to privately hold certain opinions". What I did say was that the simple fact that someone is able to effectively hide a bad belief from me has no bearing on how I feel about them having that belief. Meaning…