I think they are referring to reliability of the site overall

I know. Ign has multiple reviewers as well. People have still been referring to what ign gave a game, not the specific reviewer.

No, I thought you specifically critical of the hand to hand fighting controls. It seems like you don't like the overall controls. I didn't have a problem with them. I thought your issue was the hand to hand fighting wasn't as deep as Arkham.

Its only ironic if you attack someone for stating their opinions first right? I would say I'm critical of the reviews length and lack of detail.

I actually meant the av club's gears review. And shower they did.

You Can fight hand to hand, but it isn't an integral part of the game. Nathan drake kills, batman doesn't.

But there is a lot of hand to hand fighting. Which uncharted does not have

I disagree. Some reviews are more informative than others, this isn't one of them.

I agree. This review wouldn't seem so glaring without the high praise they had for gears of war 3. A repeat of an old game with terrible controls and superfluous multiplayer. His criticisms of uncharted were meant for gears.

I still don't understand how saying this review is short and lacks specifics makes people a fanboy? It actually seems like the people attacking anyone critical of the review are the fanboys. I haven't seen anyone say this writer sucks, just that the review is lacking. Then a bunch of commenters yell at them, av club…

You're a dick

Did you read the gears of war 3 review? A suck up piece.

Nifty is right. Auto correct text sucks, niggy keeps changing.

You said you have a good impression of the game, but you have no idea. If you have played previous versions you would have a better idea.

Did you even review the comment you are replying to? Or are you just trolling comments?

You can assume you have an idea of the game from the review, but that is just an assumption. It didn't seem very informative to me.

This review doesn't have much substance to it. It's pretty short and sparse on detail. It seems like the reviewer didn't have the patience for the learning curve, especially for the multiplayer since it is very different from cod.

Hard to get anything from staring at words and not comprehending them. Making up meanings as you go is overrated.

If they bother, this review seems to come from a few minutes of gameplay

The climbing set pieces aren't for everyone. What about the long battle from the back of the train to the front? That is some great gun play.