“I never claimed that any person was actually turned away from shelter by the Salvation Army, so why should I have to point to any person that was actually turned away from shelter by the Salvation Army? That doesn’t make any sense.”

Then.
IN WHAT WAY.
Is it their fucking fault.
That Jennifer Gale died?

Jesus. You argue…

“And we aren’t badmouthing if it’s fucking true you fuckstick.”

Except it isn’t, dumbass.

Not quite, shit-stain. I’ve been asking you to back up your bullshit claims about the Salvation Army since you started this nonsense. The only thing you had was “Jennifer Gale”, which I promptly discounted. You’ve never been able to point to any single person that was actually turned away from shelter by the…

Emotional about people bad-mouthing the organization that saved my mother’s life? Huh, go fucking figure. Also, you’re a fucking hypocrite if you don’t have a problem with the Red Cross “selectively helping people”.

So, the answer is no, you’re not going to provide any proof to back up your bullshit assertions?

“Oh no! Fuck the Red Cross and fuck your dad. he should be dead!” ~~some Gawker asshole

Name one, you shit-stain. Salvation Army’s policy is (and has been for years) that they do not turn away people in need of shelter.

I provided you with a link where Bier recanted her original claim that the Salvation Army denied shelter to Jennifer Gale. I guess the truth is still getting its pants on while you help spread the lie halfway around the world.

I laid out the facts of the case. You’re just too stupid or wrapped up in your bias to acknowledge them.

Let me make sure I’ve got this right. Jennifer Gale never asked for shelter at the Salvation Army, and their policy at the time stated that they would not have denied her access to the facilities if she had, but in your opinion it’s still somehow their fault that she froze to death?

Gotcha. That tells us everything…

Oh, please. You disingenuous, equivocating jackass. We both know you were (wrongly) laying blame for Gale’s death at SA’s feet with this little gem:

Since you seem incapable of reading, or of finding a responsible adult to read it to you:

“Although we’re still inquiring, there is in fact currently no evidence that Gale was ever refused shelter, or indeed that she had ever requested it.”

http://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/news/2008-12-19/718507/

Your willingness to throw under the bus an organization that dedicates itself to good works based solely on disproved rumors and innuendo because it fits squarely in with your biases and preconceived notions. Do you not understand how this reflects on your…

I have prioritized the LIFE-OR-DEATH well-being of one person over the inconvenience of many others. Yes, it means more to me that the Salvation Army QUITE LITERALLY saved my mother’s life as a young woman (a fact you keep displaying ambivalence towards) than it does that they don’t let their employees conduct same…

I’m not going to take lectures on having empathy for others from someone who has, in this very conversation, demonstrated an inability to do it themselves.

“There are several organisations that try to help people in that position, not only the Salvation Army.”

At the time, there more certainly were not.

“the Salvation Army is successful when it should not be”

Oh, seriously, just go fuck yourself. Go get cancer and die, you horrible little person.

There were none.

Your comment was that they were “objectively bad”, which is quantifiably not true. Your argument was that they don’t deserve our charitable giving at all, which would have prevented my mother, at 24, from escaping her abusive ex-husband. But I guess that’s OK with you because some guy refuses to do your same-sex…

So any group that doesn’t completely align with *your* personal belief system deserves no funding whatsoever? OK then. Guess my mom should have just stayed with her abusing ex-husband. Thanks!