He's clearly a troll or a rape apologist. life is too short. However, I do agree it's very dangerous when the reviewer is championing rape apology in the comments. the AV Club has sunk to a depth I didn't think possible.

Yes if course cos you're able to read Murphy's mind. Murphy the fictional character who says what a bunch of neanderthal writers make him say or think… rape is rape. there was no consent, therefore rape.

You can guess and believe and all that mubo jumbo. You are wrong about me, you are wrong about this. no consent. Murphy was raped. The fact that the writers are Neanderthals when it comes to this stuff doesnt change anything. rape is rape.

I don't care what you believe. no consent was given. rape is rape. all the arguments have been done to death already below. i really have no wish to converse with someone trying to legitimise rape.

Yes that is all well and good and it fits with the main criticism that all the arcs for the season so far have been rushed. However, we do know why Ice Nation is a threat. they are traditionalists. Skaikru only gained entry to the coalition because of Lexa. It was only Lexa who insisted on modernising Grounder ways.…

The only death that was problematic was Kwenthrith's for all the reasons cited. Yidu's death made perfect sense to me. Setting her up as Athelstan 2.0 was not something I wanted to see. it would have been dull and repetitive. While I would have liked to see more depth to her character and have her become more of a…

Yes that scene was way worse than what they did with lexa but there won't be any gnashing of teeth.

I don't get the criticism of Ontari. She has only had one full episode and they did flesh out her character. She was taken from her parents and raised by an abusive 'mentor' for the sole purpose of taking power. She has never known love, is insecure and uses violence to mask her insecurity. For someone who has just…

There is no evidence that business is personal for Chuck. Chuck's interference with Jimmy has always been about protecting himself or the firm. It's just the identification with Jimmy's POV leads people to sympathise with Jimmy. See the earlier episode where he catches Jimmy out for solicitation in the Sand Piper…

What Chuck did was business. What Jimmy did was personal. Jimmy crossed a big redline and proved Chuck right.

Chuck isn't against Jimmy cos he is a bad lawyer. He is against Jimmy cos he is a conman who won't give it up.

This is laughable. It's like a parody of every 13 year old proto-libertarian fuck society masturbation fantasies… but he is serious.

His pitch was slick and showed a similar showmanship to Jimmy. But it was 100% legit while Jimmy's are usually not. That's the difference between the two Jimmy could be like Chuck if he didn't really want to be Saul Goodman…

a stupid example that doesn't have any relevance and shows you don't know what you are talking about.

You don't seem to understand why referencing a battle (stalingrad) has absolutely no bearing on this scene. the fact you do, tells me you don't really understand what is going on. so why would I bother. You're just another avclub cynical dumbass and probably a sock puppet.

If this is a 'cold war' situation (it isn't) Jimmy just launched the nukes.

This episode was brilliant. The whole episode was about flipping the perspective that the show spent the last 2 seasons building: Jimmy as the lovable rogue and Chuck
the spiteful brother. The scene with Chuck and Howard making their last minute pitch to Mesa Verde was excellent. When it came down to it Chuck wasn't…

You were supposed to have that reaction! The whole episode was about flipping the perspective that the show spent the last 2 seasons building: Jimmy as the lovable rogue and Chuck the spiteful brother. When it came down to it Chuck wasn't out to screw Kim so as to screw Jimmy by extension. He was out to make a play…

wow, that takes the biscuit for inanity.

oh dear! I really can't believe I take the time to try and converse with sad people like you!?!