I only wish they resolved the Glen thing so I didnt have to read all the complaints that they didn't resolve it.

Going on what we saw so far it's nihilism. But hopefully they flesh it out more. I've a hunch (based on absolutely nothing) that the reason they are the way they are is because of some bigger 'bad' guy/group that hasn't been introduced yet.

Not liking something and taking offence at something are two different things. If you're going to try be condescending to someone its better to know the difference.

there's nothing much to add really, your passive aggressive tone really shut down any potential for 'civil disagreement'. I find it distasteful.

who cares? I don't even lookk at the credits. It's literally the stupidest thing people could be talking about.

He's had 3 appearances and about 10 lines of dialogue. The passive aggressive tone doesn't suit you really.

Well you see I didn't even notice that about the credits cos it's not that interesting until I came here and saw people complaining about it. Heck I didn't even know Glen's name was Steve Yeun.

if you didn't actually look for stuff like this, the show would still be immensely good! You might be surprised!

This episode was great. They really succeeded in adding depth to the Eastman character which in turn fueled Morgan's arc. Now that we can see where Morgan is coming from his reactions so far this season have been pretty good.

It's just so cliched and shallow. Maybe a few years ago when there was a lack of historical TV shows I would have bought into this. but not now with the superb Vikings. Vikings set the bar and this falls incredibly low in comparison.

the key word there is surely chosen (to be a pyschopath). The Walking Dead has been pretty good in showing the material conditions that lead to people's actions rather than just showing that 'villians are all villainy cos psychopaths, duh!' It would be really disappointing for that to change.

Yes that was my immediate thought upon seeing the couple. The camera did seem to linger on them so I wouldn't be surprised if they are back.

Look friend you can stop following me around trying to tell me what to do. I don't care what your opinion is.

This was fun . I loved it.

Alfred is a terrible character. His strengths are all plot devices and making the vikings seem so barbaric and 'uncivilised'. The reviewer is really trolling or playing the fanboys if he thinks this is a show with good characters. Uthred is still a cliche.

Yes, I don't get the Talking Dead either? Nor do I appreciate all the people who will use it when making points about the show on any given week. The show should definitely stand on its own.

here's the great thing about the internet y'all don't seem to get: I can watch anything I want and I can then comment on it any way I please. You don't get to tell me what to do. So if you have an argument: fire away. otherwise you should keep your opinions to yourself.

But here's the thing: if we didn't live in an age where there is always some guy to go 'but he's listed on IMDB for the next 20 seasons' or a Talk show about the show, would it feel cheap? As someone who only follows the actual show, I don't think so, it was an incredibly powerful episode for me regardless of whether…

The reviewer is aware that this show is designed to be essentially meaningless dribble. Nice looking, well acted, well filmed, but ultimately, meaningless dribble. So any claim they make can only ever be conditional as the show is specifically designed not to give any answers but to make any answer any individual…

cos it's just a plot device/Lindelof gimmick and Ghost Patti/Lindelof told you what happened.