It’s actually quite ironic that by criticising homeless people for being homeless, Trump is in fact providing cover.
It’s actually quite ironic that by criticising homeless people for being homeless, Trump is in fact providing cover.
Bullshit. Trump could inject liquid viagra directly into the base of his shaft and still barely maintain half a nasty.
Is no-one going to mention Kushner?
You’re comfortable that Corbyn’s Labour Party is a broad church, inclusive towards the views of Labour supporters all the way from hard left to centre left, in a way that makes it a good electoral bet? Have you seen any opinion polls lately?
You don’t think the right wing media is capable of presenting a bad outcome as a good one if it suits the interests of their preferred candidate? And you don’t think it’s possible that Corbyn could alienate a lot of centrist pro-remain voters in a general election? Ok pal, you do you.
Alternatively, no deal Brexit will be a disaster but not a planes falling out of the sky disaster, which will allow the right wing media to act as if it’s NBD and actually great news for the country. Corbyn’s pathetic ongoing left-wing purity test will alienate exactly the kind of middle-class suburban voters Labour…
Yeah, maybe. Personally I’m going to give it a few years to be sure he’s not also an irredeemable shitbag before feeling sorry for him. Let’s be honest: he’s playing genetic Russian roulette with five bullets in he gun.
Hallelujah.
Project Veritwat, as Malcolm Tucker might say.
Thrifty intravenous drug users.
Well, the Chinese middle class has grown massively in the past couple of decades - from about 4% of its population in 2002 to 31% just 10 years later. That’s roughly 350 million extra middle-class people.
If you’re a Republican in a red state you follow the party line because you’re terrified of getting primaried by an even more right wing lunatic.
It's ok, I know what you meant. I was just clarifying: not letting anyone get away with anything only applies when it's someone who isn't on your team.
Where's the evidence that the right gives a remote shit about people (who look and think like them) cheating? Case in point: the 45th president of the USA.
How many wedgies did you have to take to make you so committed to vengeance against school children, Miller?
Well in that case we have a good real-world example to use and there should be no need to rely on false ones, right?
My first experience with Dick Swett was watching the November 1996 election results in the Oxford Union bar of all places. I say of all places because November in Oxford is generally pretty cold.
Shunned? I'd favour hanged.
It’s like losing to the Washington Generals Examiner.
You’ll probably find that those are round numbers in rubles or bitcoin.