Exactly. I was just using it because each group was about 120 experience. At lower levels that's huge. I liked that a lot because there were times in the campaign the first time I felt like I was too weak.
Exactly. I was just using it because each group was about 120 experience. At lower levels that's huge. I liked that a lot because there were times in the campaign the first time I felt like I was too weak.
I think it's the exploitive nature of it. Like we're getting one over on the game or something.
I wouldn't say best. I'd definitely say most popular, and largest, but I don't think I'm alone when I say for a long time it's been a bit of a convoluted mess.
Well I think I should preface it with I was trying to find a game that I can play with the wife. She likes games (not as much as me), but she has a hard time with the whole two analog sticks when it comes to FPS (hell so do I sometimes). I was thinking this might be a good one for us to team up on since it looks like…
I'm just curious, but I have this game for PC and enjoy it a lot. I ended up buying it for PS3 because I'm a dummy and wanted to try out a game (why I picked a $60 one I'll never know). I don't currently own a PS4 so I'm guessing that once again I'd have to shell out $60 for it on xbone.
I seem to remember this exact same discussion about WoW, right before they gave out epics for logging in and making the entire loot system pointless.
"When the Fallen" Should say when the Hive #corrections
But it's light for YOU. Sort of like both sides being right. Who told you it was light? The ghost and in a sense the Traveler. Sort of like how our political system works. Whichever side you're on you're right and everyone else is evil. If there are two travelers maybe they're both giving "light" powers to the Fallen…
This roster is great but sometimes I wish they would bring back more odd characters (I'm ancient so I like old games).
I'm down with first person Diablo
I very much agree with this. I always find it strange that gamers stick so hard to reviews. Sure people can have similar opinions but does that actually make a game bad?
I guess I'm an old gamer, but boy do I miss the days when games didn't need to freaking explain every single thing in a story to you. Sure I grew up playing games like Metroid and Zelda where barely anything was explained other than there are bad guys and/or someone was kidnapped. Get them!!!
THANK YOU! I hate how everyone expected Tyrion Lannister in robot form. I'm so tired of the "Insert comedic robot sidekick" crap. Not every robot has to be Claptrap.
For the record I am not saying this game is the best thing ever played but I think it is so similar to Borderlands I don't get how it is being killed by so many people.
I honestly don't get all of the criticisms out there about this game. Storywise this is obviously the first part with the idea to just introduce you to the world. Just like an MMO things will change over time. Hell I doubt a ton of people could explain who/why Ragnaros existed in vanilla WoW. And that story changed…
THANK YOU! It's because everyone expects Robot Tyrion Lannister or Claptrap, or any other (insert snarky comedic relief robot).
In some cases I actually prefer the 3 person limit. I mean I can't count how many times I was in an MMO fight that we won by friends (meaning we just kept throwing people at it until we won out. You also sit there with people who will just wait to find a 20 and beg them to take them through it. Defeating the point.…
So when the lid is up the controller is upside down? That would drive me crazy.
It's actually a pretty crazy story. One side of it was about violence in gaming and for some reason several senators were convinced the point of the game was to trap the women in the home and kill them (which is actually the opposite).
How sad is it that I started yelling at the video at work, when they started talking about blowing in the cartridge.