My impression of that was that he was trying to be self depreciating. That he was willing to cheat and didn’t attract more than three women despite being a funny rich celebrity.

Let’s not pretend this is going to be nonpartisan, it’s going to be liberal.

I like how your comment implies that just being from Massachusetts is how you end up attending Harvard.

Catholic here (although not really “devout”). I wouldn’t care. The bread is just bread. It’s only significant when it’s part of the ritual at mass. The wafer design isn’t even strictly that important, I’m sure it’s popularity is more down to its ability to make cheaply and store for a long time. I’ve been to smaller…

I really don’t think it was about negotiating strength. The charity thing wasn’t a power move, it was damage control. This dumb story was going to hurt his public image in Hollywood, so he had to cut his losses for the sake of his future finances.

Yeah it’s being covered in such a dumb way. I get not liking Wahlberg in general, but the idea that it’s your fault if your salary is too high compared to your co-workers is ridiculous. If I demand a raise from my boss and get it, but my coworkers don’t, it’s not my fault they get paid less, and vice versa.

Of course he is, he just took a $1.5m pay cut because of something that was completely out of his hands. I mean obviously he’s not going to be homeless now, he’s still a rich moviestar, but I don’t think anyone likes finding out that they lost their Christmas bonus, even if they are rich. Honestly, the solution being…

Sure, that’s a dick move, but it doesn’t involve Michelle Williams’ pitiful salary at all, which is the subject of the article.

As much of a douche as Mark Wahlberg probably is, I really don’t see how this stuff was specifically his fault. He negotiated to get paid a lot, but that hardly took money away from Michelle Williams. He probably had no knowledge of what she was being paid. The ones I would blame are the agents and the ones cutting…

Dog Head Guy sketch and the gay pornstar sketch were the two best. I agree that Bill Murray really botched the Steve Bannon bit. I thought they did a good job making him look like Bannon but he didn’t talk or behave much like him at all. It was weird how they also had him trying to walk back his statements from the…

Honestly, it kind of annoys me that Bill Murray acknowledged the existence of Logan Paul. I was happier feeling like he was more of a nobody.

In general, most people don’t pay full price to see movies unless they’re fairly sure they’ll like it (or they’re fairly sure their kids will like it). It’s why even moderately low Cinemascores are rare and a very bad sign for a movie. I can’t really remember any time I’ve seen a truly dreadful movie in a cinema. The…

Sure they have, but Trump isn’t going to waste valuable TV time trying to learn what all those positions actually are either.

“Friend”

No, silly, it’s only the truth and telling it like it is when she’s on Trump’s side.

Well it’s not just that he’s too lazy, it’s also that he’s too dumb and lacking in any kind of curiosity about his own job to know why those positions are even important.

Her Karma is so bad she will come back as a sea cucumber, or worse, a land cucumber.

If he wasn’t so stupid, I might find that idea implausible.

Well yeah, he knew what he needed to say to get the job.

I kind of think he might have done a Limitless-type of thing where, as a surgeon, he took such an enormous amount of his own general anesthesia that he’s now stuck feeling a moderate form of their effects for the rest of his life.