domhnalltrump
DomhnallTrump
domhnalltrump

He's taking after his idol. I'm surprised he agreed to be interviewed by "fake news" like the Daily Beast to begin with.

"Look with your special eyes"!

It's the role Ryan Gosling played in that one movie.

Just because they aren't always the best anymore doesn't mean we need to really get in the weeds to figure out how good of a boy they are for each movie.

I wonder how long it will stick around for. It would be interesting if computers resulted in icons becoming their own kind of language where they slowly change over time, while still resembling or and having thematic links to their originators. So that in like 100 years, a floppy disk-esque symbol will still be used

Maybe not if you do it for a day or whatever, but I think in the long term it will. It just lets it fester. There's stuff like that where you do need to be aware of it and understand it in order to ever combat it.

Do you have a source on that? According to AdWeek, he was the number 3 most viewed cable news host of Q2 2017, behind only Tucker Carlson (1) and Maddow (2). Hannity is also at No.2 in the 25-54 demo (behind Maddow), which I guess doesn't care much for Carlson.

It's actually using the free market, you'd think they'd be all for that.

Does he think he's the Republican Justice League?

Unless you actually need this for PTSD or whatever, I really don't think putting yourself into more of a nice liberal bubble is really going to help anyone.

I don't really think Ghostbusters in general is particularly pro-free market, I just think that's an unfortunate implication of the plot with the regulator. I really do think we as the audience were supposed to side pretty much completely with Venkman in the argument because we think he's cool and witty over the

Very few of these film video-essays actually feature the authors on camera, or if they do it's only at the very end after the main video has ended. Most just use voiceovers, like the one in the article above. It's also not that common to try and inject comedy bits or "personality" into these either.

They look like the video in this article.

Even then though, he's the leader of the company. His motivation is self-interest. The reason he nearly fires Bob is for committing the ultimate objectivist sin of showing altruism and trying to help another person purely out of empathy and he chides Bob for taking pity on their own customers who are in difficult

The public know who they are (or at least who Bob and Helen are). Superheroes were previously celebrities, just about 15-20 years before the events of the film. The public were the ones who demanded they stop superheroing.

I know that it's pretty easy to draw some parallels between the movie and the works of Ayn Rand, but at the same time, isn't the villain also a sort of Randian heroic figure?

Tbh, I kind of like the idea of her just berating him from off-screen.

It's the George Lucas re-release. It makes the movie so much more dense this way.

Maybe the AV Club should just make their own Youtube channel with things like scene breakdowns and movie analysis. It's a cottage industry on Youtube and there seems to be an endless appetite for channels doing this.

It goes even further. The version Mr Incredible beats in the jungle is the 9th. 8 previous robots had been defeated and then improved upon. He was using their fights to learn how to make them stronger.