Why is the author making such a big deal out of Sansa's 'rape' scene? He characterizes it a mistake or misstep on the part of D&D as if that's not an opinion. (I italicized that word because I did not consider it rape nor was it gratuitous)

Who says he was a 'nerd'?

It's a fantastic book. Accessible, I think, to the non-geek crowd.

The book was so good I almost didn't want a film adaptation for fear it would hurt the book somehow.

I didn't say I didn't see the actual show as entertainment.

I didn't see it as entertainment.

Wait, no, I agree with you. That's what I'm saying.

I agree. These guys want to inject 21st century sensibilities into a medieval world.

"compromised" candy. *giggle* Good use of the term!

Who is actually complaining?

Let's see if those complaining about the 'rape' scene are also complaining about Shireen getting burned alive. I hope GoT doesn't bend to the pressure and become diluted and 'safe'.

I couldn't help wondering why someone would bite something and "put it back." Throw it away.

Good question. I'm not sure.

Here's a popular fan theory, on par with R+L=J in my opinion, which helps explain the long alternating shots between the Nights King and Jon Snow. It also explains why the White Walkers decided to attack when they did. Jon Snow's presence at Hardhome sparked the attack. If this is the original Nights King then he…

Thems fightin words

Exactly what I thought.

Oh please. Not in the least.

I'm going to miss this fine show.

I thought the fact it WASN'T shown was a nod to those critics who made it an issue.

They are inventing alot of things not in the book.