dollyrkr
dollyrkr
dollyrkr

If by "15 year study by scientists" is crazy talk to you, that's cool. Personally I enjoy logic.

I'm 40. My tits are awesome. I wear bras as seldom as possible.

It's funny that they assume she's going because of Kim. I'd go because Kanye. The whole first paragraph there about the women being famous, talented, whatever, Kanye is more talented and famous than either of them.

Scientific studies have shown that using bras makes your boobs sag because they do not develop the muscle to hold themselves up on their own. I detest bras also, Cristina, and I am 100% with you. They are torture devices and I only own two that I wear as rarely as possible. The absolute first thing I do when I get

Wow could you possibly show yourself to be a more condescending, self-righteous brat? Thanks for letting everyone here know that you have a low I.Q. and an even lower sense of decorum.

what am I gonna do? Sue him... with money I obviously don't have considering I'm looking for work... laws don't matter if you don't have money or proof.

holy crap

Thanks. Maybe you can have a smile for the day that there's a woman out there who doesn't think of any of those stereotypes when she thinks of black women, and maybe my "ignorance" could be your bliss... wouldn't it be nice if everyone were as ignorant as me? :)

Okay so this is the fairest point made here. The part about how there are a lot of strong black females in the media currently and there is a need for someone to play them and obviously it should be a black woman. That logic makes total sense to me. I was just reading the article, and the whole explosion of

I want to be clear I'm saying this with no sarcasm and genuine curiosity: can you tell me about this "long insidious history of black men playing black women" because I am entirely unaware of this. The main image that comes to mind when I think of black men playing black women is Eddie Murphy playing Big Momma, which

Ah, so you're saying that the people who write the skits are racist against Latinos. I get it.

Now playing

Yeah, I still just see it as weird to force a comedy show to be accountable to any demographic. Like Lindy complains about black men dressing as women for laughs, like there should have been black women playing those bits. Ever seen Kids In The Hall? Monty Python? It's pretty classic humor to have men play women,

I am aware of this, however the logic of the joke is flawed.

Agreed, but I don't think that's the point of the article, which is why I made the point that I did.

Okay, a) you can't rewrite history. So, the notion that you're going to have 7 black women in a cast of 10 to "even things up" over the entire course of the show's history is nutty.

agreed. don't understand why that was thumbsed-up. people are great, they are amazing, and the fact that we are able to use math and logic means we are great.

and in no way was I defending "but the white people"? I was simply stating facts that counter the notion of hiring a surplus of black women when there are other races to also represent.

I believe you're taking my point backward. The point would be that we'd need to include more Latinos and Asians (at least one per cast, and half the cast should be women) if we're going to hold SNL accountable to reflecting the demographic of America. Which, by the way, they have no obligation to do.

I'm not saying there shouldn't be black women, however a) there is just no obligation whatsoever that a TV show has to have whatever number of sex/race people on it, and b) what about Latinos, which make up more of America than blacks? Why is there a focus on black women? So, I'm just saying if the argument is (and

I wasn't bringing up math like "it's the end all be all" I was just stating facts because the notion that they need to hire several black women is flawed if SNL is supposed to be representing America (which, they actually have no obligation to do)