I didn't get around to it until last year - it's my fiancee's favourite film but she was terrified of me finding it dull. I was lucky enough to see it on the big screen as part of a Hicthcock revival at my local arthouse - from the first shot I was mesmerised and it never let up. Absolutely incredible film. Definitely…

Modern Love for me too. I didn't love the film as much as most seemed too, though I started to really warm for it and the character from the dinner party scene onwards. But the sequence of her dancing through the streets with Modern Love blaring was the perfect mixture of song, action and character and one of the best…

Personally I found it to be just another self-indulgent "Hey, a cameo from an old pop culture person! How quirky and random!" that these films seem to suffer from. See Bridesmaids and anything by Apatow.

Certainly saved me from pirating it, and in better quality too.

Sitcom-wise (so leaving aside stuff like Mitchell and Webb, Monty Python and Fast Show):

It's a UK one but I've rather not say which one, being as it's probably bad etiquette for staff to go calling the talent dicks on the internet.

My leisure insists that I agree with your shout-out to Zimmer's 'What Are You Going to Do When You're Not Saving the World?" - possibly my favourite piece of film music this year. Soaring, energetic, heroic - everything you want a Superman theme to be.

I work in a concert venue and met Ian Anderson a couple of years ago. He was a dick.

" Fans of Austen (or laughter) need not apply." was a fair clunker as well. Just awkward.

I caught it at the cinema and, whilst I don't know how well it would work with the big screen bombast taken away, I thought it was a really fun adventure film. There are some odd choices made (the framing device) but everyone's clearly enjoying themselves and the set pieces are pretty impressive when you know how much…

I don't know, I came out of it thinking the Russians were real shits for blowing up their satellite and causing all of this murderous debris in the first place.

All of this is a perfect summation of the problems with the article's claim.

For those on the fence may I also point out that it may show have biggest disparity between advertising and film quality this year (at least in terms of underselling the film). All of the trailers I saw made it look like a by-the-numbers and slightly grating film but I watched it yesterday and it's absolutely…

I manage a cinema and every Christmas Eve, whether it's before or after we close, I stick this film on the big screen. It's awesome.

That reads perfectly in a Scruffy tone.

Same here. I can't see how they wouldn't be proud of that movie and am assuming it was just a joke about how people may have reacted to its lack of closure. Either way, I was wowed by that film and it's only grown on me since then. It may well be my favourite film of theirs, barring Fargo. Maybe.

Am I right in thinking they started filming that one and abandoned it or did it not get to that point. I remember it was at least all set to go and that it's why Brad Pitt was growing a massive beard about ten years ago but I'm not sure if it even got to see a camera lens.

Every hack movie journalist has had a blank article entitled 'No Country For Cold Men' since they announced they were adapting it. If not for our sake, Coens, for theirs, please.

My thoughts exactly. Didn't the Burn DVD have a special feature on it marking it as the third in the Clooney Idiot Trilogy?

Agreed. Not only are there plenty of examples of good Hollywood remakes of foreign films (Magnificent Seven is such an obvious example that it can almost be dismissed as its own special case, but also more recent examples of The Ring and The Departed) but if a story is strong enough then retelling it for a new…