he was publicly warned multiple times. A lot of what he said would fall under racism, too.

Perhaps a platform where the first line on the page doesn’t read: “Co-host of the 6pm SportsCenter, aka The Six.”

She just needs to make a private twitter for friends and family. I mean, when you have ESPN all over your twitter and tweeting sports story’s, and then all the sudden politics, it kinda makes sense to me.

So the Red Sox are still stealing signs then?

It’s a shame, really. The dems have become the alt-center (I think that’s Mayumi’s term) where every policy position or even every utterance has to be focus grouped first to make sure that we’re not upsetting anyone. It’s the West Wingification of politics, where the douche with the best credentials and the most…

I see what you’re saying here, but I would modify it a bit. I have no idea when it happened, but at some point the Clinton wing of party (which represents only about 8% of them at this point) decided that criticism of the democrats and of Clinton in particular means that you’re racist and misogynist. It’s like they…

There’s something else: Democrats are calling everyone ‘racists’ (not just NUTS).

The issue is that the left and right have redefined ‘left’ and ‘right’, and it’s not the obligation of the centrist to move to one of those new labels.

They’re losing them. They have no coherent message or ideology because they keep trying to gerrymander their message to appease their donor class without alienating their voting base—that’s impossible because those two groups are at cross purposes. The state party apparatuses have atrophied to the point where they…

Don’t you know that every American must fall into one of two camps? If you don’t, you’re “wasting your time,” or some such.

That is what the article argues for, yes.

What are we attacking? When has attacking worked before? Also, what about those of us who aren’t and will never be Democrats (or Republicans)?

Democrats, attack!

2018 will be the last of the Democratic party if they end up losing a significant number of seats. They will, because that’s what they do.

You don’t think women can be just as misogynistic as men?

I can’t decide if the author is being facetious or not.

Right because this kind of thing never happens at “real jobs”. Theres never been an instance where another employee does something stupid and endangers his fellow coworkers jobs.

To be fair, if, say, you worked in a corner store and depended on it to live, then people started to threaten to boycott corner stores of your company because of something rediculously stupid/racist a single higher up said, you’d be more concerned about, you know, having food and a place to live than what was actually…

I understand where you’re coming from, but if tomorrow, someone told me my job was in jeopardy because of the racist remarks of my boss, I would really be scared about how to deal with “putting food on the table”.

Where are the tweets saying one is more important than the other? Is it so crazy that people are concerned about their financial income? Maybe you’ve never have to worry about paying your bills but for many that is a terrifying thought. More so than someone being racist on the internet. Does that make the issue here…