If it's only only pooled where they rely on each other, like you said, then that I can see. As long as it's not just a general practice.

And sorry for calling you an asshat.

Its not a big deal. Far from it. Just having a discussion here.

Oh gotcha. Just a misunderstanding. OK no worries have a good day.

Whoa, whoa, whoa, back it up there a bit.

You say "When tips are pooled, bad nights don't sting as much, and your income becomes more consistent". Yes that makes sense, however when You are having a bad night (and it shows to your guests) your income shouldn't be consistent. You should make less when you do a worse job and make more when you do a better…

Now I know. It's Catch Phrase! ;)

No you misunderstand what I was asking. The way you describe it is the way I think it should work.

I'm not sure what game you are thinking of but it's not Scattergories.

One comment, one question:

Haha fair enough. And ya this is one of the longest and most detailed posts ever on Gizmodo.

Well if you buy the book they don't actually care if you read it or not. Same applies here, you are giving Giz the traffic, ultimately That is why he wrote it. So you don't need to feel bad. :)

Just curious, do you feel bad for the author of every book you don't read?

Why all the hate? It costs $50, not the $450 you pretend it costs in the headline.

I'd say you have it backwards, this is the one area where Apple got it Wrong. If you want an Apple device you have 1 and only 1 choice (OS wise), whereas if you want an Android device you have dozens to choose from.

It's not. It is the Old way of accessing the mutitasking menu.

It's not. It is the Old way of accessing the mutitasking menu.

The reason I say you are missing the point is you are debating something that I am not disputing. I agree that the reason many (probably most) women want to lose weight is to help attract a mate.

Worst web address ever: