djwgibson
Jester David
djwgibson

This is literally why I clicked this link.

Assuming no photoshop manipulation took place (because cutting his profile pic and verified name and pasting it over another name would be effortless and practically invisible)... were these people not consenting adults?

Given you can get a PS4 that looked like Spider-Man’s costume it’s only a finite amount of time before there’s PS5s in a bewildering array of colours and patterns. 

There’s something a little redundant in comparing apples to apples...

Not to condone or forgive the human trash that marched in Washington, lapped up the lies spouted by the King in Orange, or stormed the capitol in a failed coup... but something like 796,000 police officers in the USA. That’s like 0.38% of the adult population. Or, almost four-in-a-thousand.

“Post-COVID”???

I’ve wondered about this as well.

Sure the hacks are fun for a bit if you’ve built your style around that, but more troubling is what they point to: CP’s extremely broken gameplay systems that haven’t had the balancing or testing of what we’d expect from the Most Expensive Video Game Ever made (according to Wikipedia).

The game is buggy.
The game could have used three more months of polish.
The game should have been limited to next-gen consoles or the “pro” versions of last gen.

I wasn’t 100% sure.
Canadian here, so more familiar with Canadian copyright laws. Most examples of fair use I saw focused on review; scholarly evaluation (but not education); and parody (but not satire).

Now playing

Jesus wept.
How? Read the fucking law and tell me how?

Kiiiiiinda. It’s not making money directly. But I suppose it is tangential to making money.

Advice: next time actually READ your source before you cite and reply. That way you won’t come across as a clown.

Haven’t seen Soul yet, but Reznor fucking killed it on the soundtracks of Watchmen and Mank.

Ummm.... no. Sorry, you’re way off there.

He made the image. Thus, he has copyright on the image. That’s how copyright works. Nintendo can’t legally steal his labor.

And you’re wrong:

Is it a parody/ satire?
No.

I didn’t say the artist was claiming copyright. I was responding to someone else who was saying the artist had copyright.

Nope: