At least they got the reduce-front/rear-overhangs memo.

The best part about this is how everyone has interesting counter-arguments that incite a deep thought process! Good work, all!

Yea, these are getting insane! As a quasi-experiment, I’d like to see a team create a bunch of robots, and program then to do the same thing (if possible) just to see if they can compare to the speed of a human team.

And Chevy, for that matter.

What happened, Chevy?! Were you even racing?!

The mansion in that pic with the Aston looks like something Altair would climb.

#COTD

Which may be considerable.

Yea, that 67 has been the black sheep all race.

I guess this is as good a place as any to point out that Ford is (currently) spanking Chevolet.

Word, considering they’ve been out of the game for 50 years, then developed a car for only a few years before stepping into pole.

You're probably right.

Negative. I dislike GM for a variety of reasons that I won’t get into here. And your comment is just as assumptive as mine, so we can share the award.

Word.

Good advice, here. Thanks!

“FRANK. THE. TANK! FRANK. THE. TANK!”

Admittedly, there is a LOT of speculation happening, which is partly why I like these forums. We can see some evidence, then speculate what happens behind closed doors, and bounce ideas of one another.

And still today! As an aside, that enema joke was funny, but gross, but funny.

I’ll be the first to admit I don’t know the rules forward and backward, but since Ford developed the GT production car & the Le Mans car simultaneously, doesn’t that satisfy the requirements for inclusion? I doubt the FIA would say, “Sure, Ford, develop your racecar as long as you pinky-swear to make a road car later…

Yea, I get it, but it seems like Chevy has been complaining a lot as of late, and since they have been in the series for a long time, they have political pull (similar to how Ferrari has political pull in F1).