Good choice!

I rarely agreed with Sonia which had a lot to do with vastly different perspectives on both the history of media and our expectations of what media should be now. I would enjoy delving into the comments and discussing both broader points (is this episode as good/bad as Sonia posits?) and finer points (what does this…

…it was the style at the time so we invited Morris Day but he was busy with Stella who were busy making Wet Hot American Summer which took place in the year you were born…

The Battlestar Galactica/Trump crossover isn't holding! We need to bring up the Breitbart in the rear! Someone hide the excess Ukraine!

I'm so happy to receive the toaster upvote.

Mickey and Judy weren't just a cult that took people's money. Mickey and Judy were the BEST cult that took peoples money. Don't rain on my parade!

Yes, Sawyer was purposely made better.

Where do we go from here now that all of the children have grown up
And how do we spend our time knowin' nobody gives us a damn

(Go West) Life is peaceful there
(Go West) In the open air
(Go West) Baby you and me
(Go West) This is our destiny
(Go West) Sun in wintertime
(Go West) We will do just fine
(Go West) Where the skies are blue
(Go West, this is what we're gonna do)

Obviously Alec dropped Stephen on his head a few times. What the hell is Adam's excuse? He's not even that kind of Baldwin

Sawyer is easily the least of Lost's problems. Sawyer benefits from better writing as the series goes on. Many of the characters improve as we get to know them. However Jack and Kate are at their absolute best at the beginning and it's a long drop to the bottom.

There…are…FOUR…things!

It also is the answer to both. It can be two things can also be two things. There are plenty of people who believe that it is genuinely good and, as I learned in the article above, there are plenty of people just watching for the ideology.

I had that issue with John Boswell. So much of his supporting arguments and sourcing was relegated to footnotes so the footnotes were essential. I understand that he wanted to present a simple, elegant, unassailable argument that flew in the face of accepted wisdom but that argument required the support of endless…