I heard Crossfire was supposed to be the main villain in the Mockingbird series. I guess he's back up for grabs now since it didn't get picked up.

Okay. But Fox doesn't have exclusive rights to all time-travelling warlords. Use Immortus, but change his name to Eternus, or The Gardener, or Zarkko the Tomorrow Man, or that married couple from "Runaways", or Michael Korvac, or evil future tyrant Hulk. There's loads of time-travelling Marvel characters who can play…

The Chitauri were just generic aliens. Only notable thing about them was that hive-mind thing with their monster vehicles.
If Marvel needs some shapeshifter aliens, they could use the Dire Wraiths or Space Phantoms.

Yep. (Although Modok is AIM.)

The doctorate was included in the settlement of the case of Von Doom v. Trump University

Not necessarily. They may have been the same person, but Immortus has exclusively been used in Avengers comics. So long as they ignore the Richards family name, they have a good case for ownership.

Eternity, Modok, Kulan Gath of Hyboria, the Headmen, Korvac, the Triune Understanding, the Elf with a Gun, Jude: The Entropic Man, the Bi-Beast, Goom, Mad Jim Jaspers, Googam: Son of Goom.
The list is endless.

What movie franchise nowadays has charismatic intriguing villains? Mission Impossible? Jack Reacher? Bourne? Trek? "Blank" has Fallen? What's-his-name from DaVinci Code? Deadpool? The Equalizer? Maybe you were mesmerized by the Shakespearean evil of Peter Saarsgard in The Magnificent 7?

I don't understand Marvel fans like Barsanti.
They genuinely believe that taking a comic book villain who has never worked in live action, and giving him to a studio that has repeatedly failed to create any complex or terrifying villains will somehow cancel out the FAIL on both sides.

There's a reason teens can't vote.

"Tragic Butterfly" would be a great supervillain name…and Jimmy 's going to need an archnemesis later this season…

Vigilantes need tragic backstroke or some kind of trauma to make their choices compelling and understandable. Jimmy Olsen just wants to dress up.
And that would be totally in character if he was Jimmy from the comics and this was another crazy dangerous whim that Superman/Supergirl had to drag his butt out of. But…

Or pushing himself around in a sentient wheelchair.

Did the Furbys have cartoons?

So I don't have to bother seeing Doc Hollywood?

V for Vengeance was pretty 1980s-bound too, but it built a latter day following.

Thank's Osama!

I guess. But you rarely see it in many old photographs of the era, or portraits. And those gilded age/frontier types had no shame when it came to experimenting with facial hair.

I'm skeptical that the Hitler-stache was ever a popular facial feature…even before Hitler.

The point maybe?
Brooklyn has a lot more Hindus than neo-Nazis.