disquswjqzqvardj--disqus
Paddington
disquswjqzqvardj--disqus

You said nothing, I'd hope you'd feel ashamed for taking the time to do so.

This show should really stop doing racism story lines. Just like with the shoplifting, turns out the racism didn't count because the blacks were at fault anyway… that would seem to be an expression of a worldview. A supreme worldview but also pure.

Dale was a favorite of mine because while a bit of an asshole, he was generally right. Lisa was terrible and the real villain of that season, always managing to be second worse so she never got voted off. Dale was great and when he snapped on Spike during the Wedding episode it amused me greatly.

It shouldn't be directed at me because I don't think Michael should be with Jane, he's better off being with someone else that actually takes his feelings and perspective into account.

Demonstrating agency in a situation you are meant to be passive will look selfish, doesn't mean it is selfish. Everyone else got to act in their own interests but Michael was expected not to. Given that context, no that isn't selfish or everyone was being selfish and the term has no use.

How is that selfish? His wife got pregnant b/c of an incompetent doctor and he basically had to resign himself to what other people decided. Who could tolerate having that little control over something that big in their life? Every pregnancy comes with a risk and if Jane had kept the baby what if that was the only

Yes, the Jane break up had nothing to do with Rafael, whom Michael didn't owe informing him about Petra's affair not at the risk of affecting his own relationship. Rafael was also acting shady and hiding things, that's why he got investigated. Michael being wrong isn't the same as his suspicions being unjustified

Like how he knew Jane was going to inform him of her decision and he made sure she delayed it? That happened this episode. Also, breaking up with someone for their own good and giving a false reason is a manipulation.

I feel like Rafael, as an abstraction, has consistently meddled in Michael's life for the negative. It was only a matter of time before he lashed out. Yes, he was mistaken but it wasn't like this was beneath Rafael, who consistently tries to manipulate Jane. Jane is also a problem as she has never admitted that the

Yea, his was a simple complaint of a boss that got mad. Jon Stewart's fans made me apathetic to Jon Stewart's exit. They even peak whiteness'd that all up.

I just took that as a very Daniel thing to do

Thank you. You saved me from having to say this review is an utter Morty. This person writes like every annoying food blogger that can't get to the thing you actually came here for without giving unwanted biographical information. Look, I just want the fucking recipe for miso ramen because the picture looked nice.

Strawman accusations? Good lord. Your argument was so bad I gave you a superior alternative. I was helping you. I also didn't say your argument was stupid therefore I am right. I said it was stupid, said why it was stupid and implied I'm right by giving you a better argument to frame your stupid opinions on this

I didn't struggle with anything. You have poor comprehension skills.

You're using words you don't understand. This was just nonsense. If you wanted a different response you should have crafted smarter posts. And you studied race relations? So have I and every other asshole when they need to win an argument on the internet. Whatever institution you got your credentials from is

You don't have a major case of white privilege. I don't feel the need to make degrees of white privilege, as if having just a little is somehow ok. You just have white privilege and it is making you act idiotic. There was no hope for construction dialogue from your first post and it just got worse from there. But

"You're creating strawmen" as you argue a strawman. Wyatt didn't call Jon a racist. I don't recall calling him one either. But I know you aren't having this discussion with me but with a series of talking points you need to defeat. I continue being happy to help you work all this out.

How could I, by definition, have any introspection on your position? It doesn't even make sense. Maybe Wyatt was just regular hurt? You know, emotionally. Black males have them. How this can be reduced to a battle of egos is your own cognitive limitation. Look, I got nothing out of your reply. It was just

This post is stupid. How is telling the story of a thing that happened to you, if it actually happened, sour grapes? Also, how does it become about egos plural when one party escalated the argument and dipped into peak white privilege when challenged? This, like a majority of the comments about this interview are

Blood and Bone