Get a load of Stephen Sondheim, here.

I was joking, too, because this format can't be very old. But missed the reference. Maybe cuz I'm old.

Yes/No.

You must be very young.

:(

I mean, eventually. That's just science.

Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer durrrrrrr…

Permanent healing of you canceraids.

You're really reaching. Yes, I would believe the people involved in the activity over someone who wasn't. This is not faulty logic, it's common sense.

Also tuition-free college.

Yeah. It's called Kinja.

In just seven days.

Should this be the end: I wish everyone well in their lives, and appreciate the conversations.

Fair enough. "Discussing."

Hope this turns out to be like the Y2K anxieties. Though if those had come true, I could have been proud of never having had a career, nor would I afterwards have had to begin one.

I can't make sense of your logic in thinking the person who wasn't in on the cheating knows what was going on better than the people who were doing the alleged cheating.

I'm willing to let this go—as I agree with your o.p. overall, there's no need for me to keep arguing.

Don't agree with your characterization. The biggest problem seems to be the reached adulthood when everyone who disagrees with a person just gets written off as a de facto snarling villain—unfortunately, vast portions of our populace have succumbed to that delusion.

Those are called accusations. They may be true, may not be true. If true, the reasons he indulged in them thus far are merely speculative on our part.

Xander is not meant to be a "nice guy." He's meant to be an average guy with all the potential strengths and flaws and good characteristics and failings that go along with that.