College English prof, here. The implication of your sentence is that man caves are a bad thing. If you meant something else, you need to articulate your ideas more clearly. C-.

You know if women were banned from working or attending, you'd complain—and be pissed off you were accused of whining.

No, just tired of close-mindedness and reactionary thinking posing as liberalism.

But, there's a regular stream of articles from feminists that say they don't hate men.

So you're against man caves (me too), but not against banning men from screenings? Not big on consistency…

Yep.

Yes it is, but it doesn't bother you, so you refuse to see it. Thanks for contributing to backwards thinking. Terrible example to set for kids, and an opening of the door for more intense kinds of discrimination. Good work you've done today.

Yawn.

That sounds like a good idea. I'm looking forward to the movie.

You're saying, in a roundabout way, that you wouldn't approve. Neither would I.

You don't want to admit it, so you snark.

An entire gender is being discriminated against.

If an organization had bought out the screenings, I'd have no problem. If women were encouraged to buy out screenings, an entertainment equivalent of the March on Washington, I'd think it was cool.

It is the same concept, it is discriminatory, and that is wrong. You might also look at the history of how discriminatory practices snowball.

Imagine if the AMA forbid women from practicing in that area, or a clinic refused to hire a woman in that field.

You don't read history, then.

It means to stop talking about this.

Ad hominem.

People address me, I'll respond. Of course you want me to stop talking. Of course.

Yup.