She's been good, but she's not exactly setting watercoolers abuzz the way Dinkledge/Maisie Williams, or Stellan Skarsgard, or James Gandolfini, or Idris Elba, or Jeremy Piven, or Julia Louise Dreyfus, and so on and so on did.

Yeah, by the end of the first episode, we knew that the hosts were getting loopy from some meddling by Ford and by years of guest abuse. By the end of the third episode … we know that the hosts are getting loopy from some meddling by Ford and by years of guest abuse.

After watching this episode, I'm coming around to the idea that Westworld just isn't very good. The show is moving too slow, it's characters are too obtuse, and its philosophies are too well-trod (didn't Ex Machina come out just last year) to be really that interesting.

HBO didn't spend the insane money it did on this show with the idea it would run 2 seasons. Expect HBO, if ratings hold up, to milk 7-8 out of it.

I don't think they would pay the $$$, for either Westworld or for a doll, that either series implies. But I do think that people will pay for authenticity, much more than you think. Think about how much people pay for luxury Disney/Harry Potter cruises, or some specific genre cruises that require interactive…

I wasn't a big fan of Dollhouse, but wasn't the "for hire" service a cover for the fact that they wanted to develop weaponized product? I imagine Westworld has a similar card to play.

I understand that what I said is incredibly difficult for any number of reasons. That said, it's the only truly practical way to tackle the subject.

Yes, those are words in a certain order.

I told you what it means. It means neither side really cares about the issue of sexual assault and only bring it up to score points.

That's what I figured. So quit pretending then that sexual assault is some sort of important issue to you in this race. It isn't.

Answer the question. Quit trying to avoid it with ad hominem attacks. Now that you've seen women accuse Hillary Clinton of covering up their sexual assaults, does that change your support for her one iota?

It certainly shows most people really don't care about the issue unless unless they can make some sot of political hay about it.

I've shown you at least two women (and there are others) who have claimed Hillary intimidated them into silence. Do you care at all about that?

When did I say there was? The point is to examine your particular hypocrisies, not to defend the likes of Donald Trump.

Again, thank you for proving my point.

Do you need me to link the quotes from Broaddrick and Paula Jones saying exactly that? That Hillary helped cover it up? If I did, would you believe it? If not, why not?

Women need to report as soon as something happens. It's the only way you'll convince most people that there's a problem.

Many people get a sexual thrill from dominance. Some of those people have prestigious enough jobs that they can indulge in this thrill without reprisal.

Thank you for proving my point. To people supporting Trump, these new claims are "bullshit on the internet." Your ideology is determining what you believe to be true.

Would it matter to you if Hillary knew and helped cover it up?