Hair's part of her, making it also cloak makes sense. But her coat? They could either spend a ton of money making it so that her coat also had cloaking tech, or she could just take it off. Seems like an easy choice.
Hair's part of her, making it also cloak makes sense. But her coat? They could either spend a ton of money making it so that her coat also had cloaking tech, or she could just take it off. Seems like an easy choice.
Could just be that multiple groups find similar reasons to hate her. I feel like no matter where you go you'll probably see people with fairly consistent reasons for disliking Trump, why not with Hillary too?
Didn't they say it's supposed to be self-sustaining? If they have a rainwater-collection system for the plumbing, solar panels aren't shocking.
Honestly, I think a solid 80% of the time I laugh at him it's intentional. It's not physically possible for him to have made Vampire's Kiss with a straight face.
The characters in the comic itself say that they're being ignored due to misogyny. That's the overall premise, the thing its title refers to, the thing the guy at the end is mocked for trying to counter. If that idea is false the comic doesn't work.
Hey, the comic addresses that with the endearing argument of "anyone who brings up evidence to counter my point is a dick who shouldn't be invited to the party".
The characters say that they're being ignored due to misogyny. But if men are being ignored for the same thing at the same rate then it's not that, it's just "you're saying crazy things, that seems pretty unlikely".
Is it really that bad for the brother to bring up male examples of the trope? The entire premise of the idea being sexist is that it's just a woman thing, if you can think of comparable male examples it's not a gender thing. Jason Ritter in Freddy vs Jason, Kyle Reese in Terminator, etc. Hell, going back to the…
Gretchen and Jimmy are dicks, but they're more or less morally decent 85% of the time.
I mean, they have other huge issues in their relationship.
I'm not a fan of Beyonce, but I'd take her over, say, Aerosmith.
"Without a proper response from Beyoncé, though, it’s hard to definitively say which side has the stronger case"
"Maybe when someone is repeatedly affirmed for looking scary and intimidating, it’s unreasonable to be upset when they capitalize on that."- No, I'm pretty sure that people telling you 'you're good at looking scary" isn't an excuse for threatening people. If Vinnie Jones went around breaking people's legs I wouldn't…
If anyone's emotionally manipulative in that duo it's Lindsay. From guilting him into going along with the cuckolding to convincing him that her stabbing him was his own fault. He's going along with it about as well as you could expect.
Fifty Shades Of Grey was huge, so maybe people who want a fancier version of that. But based on the sales of his first book, no one.
Is it? If you see a lot of grades, and watch a lot of graded material, you notice trends. That's not shocking.
To be fair, Trump is rude and insulting to everyone. He made fun of Chris Christie's weight while speaking at Christie's own rally.
I've seen fantastic comedies about murder, racism, slavery, the end of the world, why not human trafficking?
Thank goodness Always Sunny varies its ways of making fun of serious situations from episode to episode.
"Bad thing happens to a character, another character is motivated by that" is a trope as old as time. Why is it okay with murder, but not with rape?