The other great inspiration was the 100 years war between France and England and in particular the 6 volumes novel "The Accursed Kings" by Maurice Druon.

You misunderstood me - I loved the Lost ending and I liked the BSG ending. I did not like many parts of the "Season 4.2" in particular all the BS explanations about the Final 5, the no explanations ever given (or even hinted) to what happened on Kobol, who were the Lords of Kobol and so on. And I hated the epilogue.

There were some polls and the majority was usually positive. The negative reactions made a lot of noises but they were the minority.

It would have been of the greatest ending ever. Of course many things were unresolved but when you see how they resolved them, well, they should not have.

Challenging your intelligence is obviously very easy. You are arrogant and dismiss any idea that you do not like as "nothing". You do not deserve to be spoken to.

So if people do not think like you they are idiots. Are you able to understand that some people have a different perspective on things ? Apparently not.
The guy had some arguments. You may not like them and not agree with them. That's fine. Just answer them. Ad hominem tends to prove that you have nothing intelligent…

Well you just proved me I was right.

So I never watched Parks and Recreation and did not know "The Federalist" until today, but I read the article in question and here what he wrote almost at the beginning:

Nothing here has anything to do with discrimination. Women makes less money because they work less, and because they work less they do not get promoted as often as men. And they work less because they tend to get pregnant, what men cannot do.
That's all the story, nothing else.
But of course, "discrimination" is always…

Fans of Sherlock are aware that it is not perfect but they can't stand when other people say that the whole is up in its own ass and self-indulgent and does not even try anymore. It was a bad episode after a very bad season. The actors are excellent, the production values are great, and the writing could be fantastic,…

Repeating the same nonsense does not make it less nonsense. Fan-service is still self-indulgence, "look how smart we are" is not cleverness, and no plot means no plot meaning it's bad by definition. There was no exploration of the characters, since there was only one character (Sherlock, the rest was in his mind) and…

So, no facts, as expected.

So, no facts as expected.

Really ? Please tell us how are women in western countries oppressed and which rights they do not have so that you can claim that they are unequal ?

The show was good and even sometimes very good during the first two seasons, and then jumped the shark. We are still watching with the hope that he gets back to how it used to be, but apparently it won't happen.

I like people who lack so much self-consciousness - I said the episode (and all season 3) was *less* clever than it thought it was, so I hated the lack of cleverness ; and of course hating feminist BS is not the same as hating women (in fact I would claim the opposite). So who is not so clever ? You really must hate…

I found a nest apparently.

I like how the left-wings trolls can't stand when someone does not agree to their BS. Indeed this was not propaganda : "there is a war between men and women and we must lose it because we are wrong".

I did not like this episode, but I also hated the third season and this was in the same strand of meta-less clever than they think they are - thing, and I hated the feminist propaganda.

Lucas says he sold SW to "White Slavers". This is going to be fun.