you're just fellating his superiority complex by getting hysterical about his username, please be more self aware in the future and not so easily goaded into self parody for the love of god

these are the easiest people to troll on internet, you don't have to put this much effort into it. also i didnt read all that shit because its almost entirely devoid of actual content. hyped up dorks with english degrees are basically the entire internet you're not impressing anyone

is rape denial like holocaust denial or??? i feel that the premise of the question is too loaded with weird internet politics baggage to provoke coherent discussion.

idk you seem kinda weak and passive aggressive, easily dominated by more forceful personalities. i don't think i would take your advice on interpersonal relationships or life strategies.

i just close-mindedly dont give a shit one way or the other

lol you're just a straight up dipshit son. if you don't understand why fox wouldn't criticize hillary for her aggressive foreign policy you're either too young to vote or too gosh darn fuckin stupid. i'm not trying to be mean to you here i'm just accurately assessing your ability to comprehend basic political…

when nerds feel threatened or anxious they like to clutch pears tightly to their bosoms, often leaving unsightly smears of brown pear juice on their button ups.

the "truth is in the middle" horseshit is great at bringing out the self righteous pear clutching nerd, highlighting their absurd self seriousness. this creates incidental and residual emergent humor, exponentially compounding the entertainment value of nearly decades-old episodes of a cartoon about talking poop and…

if you think fox news has ever criticized her for being a bloodthirsty war hawk you're so grossly uninformed you need to please shut up about politics until you've taken the time to learn about the very basics of the political alignment axes and the last ~20 years of middle eastern foreign policy. please be a…

that skinny dude is always so sweaty and coked up

right. there's no question she violated the statute, it was just decided it wasn't egregious enough to qualify for prosecution based on precedents set by similar cases etc

lmao i'm not right wing you idiot i'm taking the word of experts just like everyone else does. if you think i'm wrong then google it and satisfy your own curiosity you weird partisan dork

yes, it is absolutely a crime though and multiple people have been charged with it.

it was less secure than your average gmail account, supposedly. i'm no information security expert though!

lol where did you read that crazy bullshit about information vs documents? emails are documents. documents are information. the law does not differentiate.

yeah and it was hilarious

ppl use the word bloviate like it's something incredibly gross and insulting bc its syllables are nasty but it really just means to talk for a long time

idk about spy executions or whatever but the fact she had classified documents on her insanely unsecure homebrew email server that was almost certainly hacked by foreign intelligence is established fact at this point

man they really showed him. powerful stuff, gawker media. ruthless. well played, killers.

lmao bullshit reddit has roughly 30 million daily active users, only a very small and loud fraction of them are the MRA boogeyman