disqusokgitcd0yy--disqus
Thomas R
disqusokgitcd0yy--disqus

I'd be tempted to think in this case "not feminine" might just mean "not sufficiently lovey-dovey and motherly for me."

Eh. I mean I get not wanting to publicize lunatics, but sometimes "ignore him and he'll go away" doesn't work either. Jones I think might be big enough there might be some logic in trying to deal with him. He also looks to have been on CNN and BBC years ago so the genie has been out of the bottle on this. So it's not

The Republicans were not, and are not, Nazis. They're probably less fond of euthanasia, or avoiding birth of the "defective", than Democrats. They do well with Orthodox Jewish voters and two weekly Jewish papers (The Jewish Voice and the Jewish Press) even endorsed Trump. Republicans tend to believe in federalism.

My favorite exchange with one online is when I saw this guy on Atlantic quoting Savitri Devi.

They're mentioned in King of the Hill I believe. Hank had a naked dream about cooking, literally cooking or barbecuing, with Nancy. Peggy tries to make the dream real so it'll be about her. At one point she asks if the onions in the dream were Vidalia or some other kind I forget. He exasperatingly asks what difference

Like JC Chasez of NSYNC.

"Kimmy lands a job at a startup, where her emotional intelligence is valued."

Conception, Implantation, Gastrulation, Embryonic stage, and fetal stage.

I actually did think it might go that way.

I did like that song more than many they do.

I've heard this, but are they really supposed to be that poor? I mean this business has survived awhile and on occasion it gets busy. They've traveled to Florida without difficulty. It's not like say The Middle where they didn't have a sink for several episodes or "Good Times" where they clearly lived in a somewhat

I think there is evidence that in some ways we're segregating off more of late. Maybe not in terms of race, we were always segregated there, but in terms of class, ideology, and maybe some cultural ways.

Although it has a logic the idea of, "an otherwise flawed film can be great if it empowers its fan base, or an otherwise well-made film can be a failure if it alienates segments thereof" does sound a bit overly politicizing or moralizing. It would explain why they give such good reviews to the show Supergirl, which

Yeah. I don't think people always want super sophisticated or classic films all the time. Sometimes it's fun to just enjoy the experience. And I do think, at times, criticism is not really set up for that. You need to be able to write something and if you can't explain why you enjoyed something that might be trickier.

I think some are right the percentage likely matters to people. And also you still have some free will. Like if a movie sounds good to me, but it gets say a 55%, I think I'd likely go "Meh it's still more than half, I like the idea of it and want to see how it plays out." But if a film looks completely unappealing or

Yeah. Some opinions are extreme enough you don't need to consider them much or at all. Neo-Nazis on the one hand and that "Workers World Party" that has editorials stating, "Long live the revolutionary spirit of Comrade Kim Il Sung!" on the other.

"full of happy, cheering white people and absolutely no minorities—shown in the trailer seems like a pretty nice place to live"

"This week, Rudy attempts to make jelly from grapes in Cliff’s new juicer, which she was specifically told not to touch."

Phrasing?

It was pretty impressive of Bob to do all he did. I mean he's an overweight middle aged guy. Although I have a bit of a fear of heights which made some of that story nerve-wracking. That said you could argue in some ways maybe that added to the pleasure. Austin also grew on you, without radically altering the