disqusojmyk12syy--disqus
xeranar
disqusojmyk12syy--disqus

. . .Men can have children at a later age safer than women. Yes virility of sperm fades with age but women have a solid cut-off point while men do not. It's not so cut and dry.

. . .Roman Holiday? Peck - 37, Hepburn 24.
. . .Rear Window? Stewart 46, Kelly - 24.

Star with some talent gets ground up by the corporate world and emerges as a deeper artist on the other side? Is that so impossible a situation? I mean, I agree given Cyrus herself but her situation kind of dictates one of two directions: Sad burnout as they age out of cute/attractiveness OR they grow into a

I never actually thought about that till now and when YT told me to go watch some more Kylie…I did. :S

I've never found Miley Cyrus interesting as both an artist or a person. I forced myself to watch the VMAs for the first time in probably close to a decade and her hosting was as jarring as her personality lead me to believe.

No, I think you were pretty spot on in your basic argument. It's brought up because it was a woman on the cover and thus her sexual desirability and appearance is judged. The Andrew W.K nosebleed album didn't that that kind of response and it should be acknowledged.

I had not seen this movie in a good 15 years and I remember it being hilariously stupid back then. I'm inclined to hunt it down and watch it again and see how it holds up. This is also coming from somebody who loves the Kentucky Fried Movie and all the awful copies so that late 1970s/early 1980s sketch humor seems

I know it's not one take but OK GO's Needing/Getting from the superbowl deserves a mention because it attempts to do the same thing (though they admit it took 4 days which means it's a splice job). But it definitely tries to go in the same vein. Also the folk-chevy version is actually really more enjoyable, their

That's because they're sitcom characters on a comedy sitcom. None of them are realistic to any great depth. If you want accurate relationships you're going to have to seek a drama on a prestige channel. I think BoJack Horseman does a good job vivisecting the core of sitcom relationships.

I'm going to have to disagree because Howard and Bernadette have a fairly normal relationship within the dynamics they bring. Leonard and Penny are mismatched intellectually and I tend to agree that their relationship gets irritating because Leonard seems to have superficial feelings for her and she isn't much better

SOA suffered from Kurt Sutter's marriage to Katey Segal. He never put his foot down about removing her character which would have let it overcome it's 'Hamlet' roots and thus what would have been a great show suffered because they could never let her character go and see a new world.

It really just comes down to being a Joel or Mike type. If you prefer Mike you're likely to support Pearl more. I only watched the show when it hit Sci-Fi for the most part so my core memories of Pearl but she was a fun character that never irritated because it was fun to watch her be good but brought down by Bobo &

And you've just exposed your real issue: You prefer watching the nerds bumble around doing socially inept things while ignoring any functional relationships (no matter how contrived). It's had solid ratings since the beginning and as the show's concept winds down it's naturally going to decrease. It's about time to

Shame, but hey 76 is a good life. Got to be a professor for a time, lived a life of director. Not too bad a run….Godspeed, Wes. May the next world not be as haunted as the one you invented…

I felt the ending of this season was seriously more pronounced towards next season than the first season's was. They didn't mention the Secretariat movie till either the last or next to last episode. Jill Pill and her play in NYC (which is only worth living in for 6 months and only if you're super rich) was setup

Is it really that cringing? I felt for BoJack in some really honest ways because if you run into somebody who clearly had feelings for you in the past and you NEVER mentioned that you were married or hinted at, that's a problem. Especially after she said to come visit some time it felt like she was looking to escape

I felt by the end of Wanda's run (and especially as she grew from somebody lost to somebody enamored with turning out crap) that she should go. Not that BoJack is right, he's still a self-loathing horse-human garbage dump but Wanda really is a degenerate in her own right. She's fresh-faced at doing bad things. It's

Margo Martindale's characterization of character actors is so amazing I kind of want her to appear more often. Can we get a 'very special BoJack' episode of CCH Pounder, Margo Martindale, and the other she named as a team of crack character actors who solve crimes for fun? I would watch that….Make it a filler

This episode really was hilarious if only for the HIMYM joke that ended up being Todd in makeup. Also, I am truly surprised that was Radcliffe, are they having voices phoned in or are most of them making an intentionally off-kilter voice of themselves? It's starting to seem like this may be set direction by the show

It's actually quite an interesting issue because Mr. PB is a man who's smart enough to know his limits but not smart enough to challenge most people. Bojack is by all standards a genius in terms of social awareness and remains almost always one step ahead of everybody on everything but his own ego. It's two sides of