There's nothing vicious about calling wrongdoing wrongdoing.

The very existence of the act is something bad that happens.
Any enjoyment is something bad that happens.
That they are of the same sex defines the act as wrong.

The vile opinions are the ones condoning same-sex sex.There is no compassion in abandoning people to indulge their disordered desires instead of taking on the often thankless task of pressuring them to correct their behavior.
And it is impossible for anyone to be born believing the flattering falsehoods about…

I think that same-sex sexual attraction is a disorder and its gratification a mistake.
Do you think that the existence of species that eat their young makes this a viable choice for humans?

Nope,if attraction is toward one's own sex that defines it as irrational.

It hurts them,and their indefensible enjoyment of it is a way it hurts them.

If the very nature of the act defines it as a downside any happiness deriving from it only marks the perpetrator as insane.

The hatefulness and immorality are still all on your side,so I can't get any less in those attributes from a starting point of zero…and what I am intolerant of,no one should tolerate.

Popular misconception doesn't change right and wrong.

Nope,your side is still wrong in all of this.

That something horrible makes people happy makes it no less horrible…it in fact harms those people by letting them think something horrible is OK.

You have met categorical statements of fact with blinkered denial.
THAT IT IS SAME-SEX is what is wrong with same-sex sex…and that is something VERY,VERY wrong with it.No justification that can apply for opposite-sex sex can apply for same-sex sex.

If that were true (and it is objectively false!) life could not be worth living!

You sound like someone determined to always favor lust over common sense….who feels threatened by the fact that if it's SAME SEX partners there is no responsible question that lust has gone too far.

Whatever is built on shifting sands can therefore never be worth anything.

In law,there are two concepts,"malum in se" (wrong in itself) and "malum prohibitum" (wrong because there's a law against it).

If right and wrong are not independent of subjective value judgements,then 1) they do not exist at all,and 2)all of existence serves no useful purpose.

No,it's "be a better person and realize that the kind of love you have must never find sexual expression".

Nobody's opinion plays any role in what's right or wrong here.

But only if intercourse ISN'T same-sex are the outcomes legitimate.
Humans have reasoning capacity that obligates them to reject flaws they see in nature.