Your aspersion of hatred is baseless. The sheer number of women in our movement belies such a claim.

Women can be dudes, too.

Oh, for God's sake. Feminism doesn't own human rights.

I assure you, the failure is yours. It's probably because you don't read ANY material from the non-feminist men's crowds, you're probably a feminist yourself, and to feminists all non-feminists look the same.

Dude's not looking for a productive discussion.

The makeup of the MRM is more diverse than that of feminism. We have, per capita, more women then feminism men, more "people of color" (which is a racist term, BTW), and more transgendered and gay. Especially at the forefront.

If by "whiny asshole" you mean "non-feminist," then yes. We are simply different stripes of non-feminist.

You and the author keep making this assertion that MRAs and PUAs are essentially the same thing. Can you show me where PUAs agitate to change the system, or do any of the other stuff that MRAs do? What is your basis for joining these two disparage movements?

It's not sloppy, it's intentional. Author knows they aren't MRAs, but the author knows there's no legitimate leg to stand on to attack MRAs so this is what they resort to. They've been doing it for years.

That would work if Roosh claimed to be an MRA and I was claiming he wasn't a TRUE MRA. But he doesn't. He's not an MRA — not in practice, not ostensibly, or anything.

What's more inappropriate (or rather dated) about it is that, at least by number if not by seriousness, aren't even exactly rights issues, but other kinds of issues (enforcement, policy, etc.). Got any suggestions?

No MRA ever boycotted Mad Max, Roosh isn't an MRA, RoK doesn't deal with any rights issues at all (it is completely outside their mission), and even still, Roosh didn't call for a boycott — he just said he wasn't interested in seeing it.