If 20% of this group holds inhumane views then it's logical to vet them before they're allowed entry (something which is already being done) not to deny the WHOLE group entry.

I don't care if the assumption is logical, it has to be TRUE. That's the only way a logical argument is sound, if the premises are true.

That quote leaves out a lot of what he said. And he could have made the same point without publicly outing a certain individual.

When he publicly outed and mocked a transgender student.

BTW "he plans on “making the lives of journalists, professors, politicians, feminists, Black Lives Matter activists, and other professional victims a living hell,”"

It's only logically sound if we assume that ALL the people coming from those countries share the same values.

BTW, "he plans on “making the lives of journalists, professors, politicians, feminists, Black Lives Matter activists, and other professional victims a living hell,”"

It's only logically valid if ALL of those people have said values.

Yes, because that's his big issue. Execution of gays in Islamic nations. Right.

I'm confused. You make it sound like Milo actually offered some logically valid arguments instead of juvenile shitstirring. Are you sure we are talking about the same guy?

Well Milo has done plenty of hate speech so it's not dishonest to call him a bigot.

Rational people like Milo Yiannopoulos.

Nobody is silencing you my dude, you should get better at handling a little pushback.

Allowing people more choices is just so anti-liberty.

You say intelligent political conversation and you're referring to Milo… come on man…

He didn't say that those hateful factions aren't true BLM. So it's not technically a NTS fallacy.

Uhm no, that's not what quantum mechanics is about…

Attack =/= criticise

"The proof is all around us."

Yeah, like those transsexual students he outed. What a bunch of idiots that cannot handle any criticism, am I right?