Are there any reasons to be against net neutrality of which I'm just not aware? Is there any way that this isn't just cravenly selling out public interest for campaign donations and cushy jobs?

I don't know if this has been talked about in any other comment threads, but immigration officials arrested a woman in court trying to get a restraining order against a domestic abuser. Trump creating an environment where abusers are protected and the abused are prosecuted should be a surprised to no one, but it's…

People keep shouting over the reality of what he does so that people will overlook it. He isn't interested in debate, he's trying to bully people until their lives are ruined. There's no verbal retort to someone unleashing a torrent of hate on someone to ruin their lives. He's garbage.

I oppose anti-intellectuallism, regardless of which 'side' it comes from. And as the saying goes, "there's nothing I like less than bad arguments for a view I hold dear.”

Even if he's expressing hyperbole, that is still the substance of his argument in the first tweet. It's also a line of reasoning used endlessly recently.

Oh, I absolutely agree that anyone that gets Duke's support should raise a red flags, but Sessions has his own gross, well-documented, racist history. That should be the subject of attacks against him.

I've never bought the reasoning behind "(person a) supports this thing, so it must be wrong!" Obviously David Duke is shit, as is Sessions, but, like, if they like bacon, it doesn't stop being delicious. People like great things for bad reasons and bad things for great reasons all the time, either engage with the…

And he's making sure their numbers will only grow for generations!

As far as TV bonafides, Ed Brubaker was also a producer and writer on Westworld.

No big, bankable stars? You shut your damn mouth, Dennis Quaid is a national treasure.

He didn't dox students and have them targeted for violence and harassment, so I'm counting it as a win.

Anyone who uses whatever platform they are given to incite violence should be denied any platform. There's no verbal retort to someone instructing their psychotic sycophants to destroy someone's life at any cost. If you think you have words that can stop his followers bullets, you're either wrong or a wizard.

"Worthington is out, we need some new blood to play Avatar Jones, someone with no experience, and a real piece of shit, as long as they didn't call someone a faggot in 1993!"

Are you sure it's not a strategy? I've seen countless places repeat her lies about Obama banning people and not calling it out for the complete lie it is so they could cover the more click-friendly "this person said something dumb" part of it. People are now more likely to think Obama banned people and that Trump's…

First, Obama didn't ban anyone, that is a complete lie to try and defend an illegal and inhuman policy. A.V. Club simply repeating those lies verbatim is a tacit endorsement of them. It is shameful and pathetic. This is their strategy. This is how evil wins.

tl;dr: If you think that white nationalists are ANYTHING like Nazis, you're basically a holocaust denier!

I'm a fan of 'Frustrated Nation Out Of Ideas To Solve Gun Violence Problem Except For All The Obvious Ones.'

I have seen dozens of different people claiming that the Mosque attack in Quebec was a false flag operation without ever venturing into a far right news site. It's fucking terrifying.

She said it was fine for him to do that, if he increased the donation so that he was still out the same amount. Also, two eyewitnesses backed her up. But facts shouldn't get in the way of some good ol' fashioned victim blaming.

Sean Spicer used the terrorist attack by a white Trump supporter in Quebec as proof that his Muslim ban is needed. Six dead Muslims is proof that Muslims are dangerous to these monster, who have no empathy, decency or soul. There is no middle ground, there is no compromising, President Bannon and his administration…