Right, a corporation that doesn't pay any dividends or produce any profits that get paid to the people who "own" it. Got it.
Right, a corporation that doesn't pay any dividends or produce any profits that get paid to the people who "own" it. Got it.
Right, lose the war, but go down swinging. Classic debate tactic to smear the source of the conclusion. Sounds legit. Still waiting for you to prove that the Colts deflated any balls. I don't see them losing any draft picks.
"use of equipment to videotape an opposing team’s offensive or defensive signals"
*your
Goodell is a patsy for the owners. If they wanted to replace him they would. He's a shield for 32 geriatric billionaires. As long as he's doing that right, he isn't going anywhere. However, I'm with you on not liking Goodell. Not one bit.
No. It's appropriate. Systemic cheating from an organization that's already been punished for cheating in the past while the same people were present. He also lied to the media. The NFL hasn't appropriately punished other issues, specifically domestic violence and sexual assault, but they got this one right. Brady…
The entire premise of this article is one that makes it sound like nothing more than click bait. Think piece? No. Write a separate article for separate issues. This article opens up by completely dismissing the fact that cheating occurred by referring to the cheating as just a couple of under-inflated balls. This…
The entire show is sitting on my shelf. I'm glad Netflix passed on it. It means they have money to buy something I don't own.
Definitely both.
Stephen King's inability to appreciate film as an equal form of expression in no way degrades its legitimacy, though do I agree with him about the room 237 documentary.
In other news, man with diarrhea of the mouth pontificates on the complexities of why everyone follows him around waiting for more of it to come out.
I'd rather own more property than something that could be ripped off my wrist.
Please see Bill Hicks for anything you need to know about marketing and advertising and everyone involved with it: http://youtu.be/gDW_Hj2K0wo
As access to the internet increases, the gene pool of its operators becomes all the more shallow.
What? No. Unintelligible.
Speaking not to the content of the show, but strictly in terms of rape/sexual assault, it does not matter how long they've been in a relationship.
You basically imply that only simple people who crave violence and nudity watch it. That's negative.
Exactly.