Exactly, your professor was a huge success, Marx accomplished nothing, jargon serves no legitimate purpose because you couldn't be bothered to learn the shorthand of your field, and we should reject anything that uses jargon like "heteronormativity".

I actually have gargantuan hands.

ahaha. Farewell, motard, i hardly knew thee

To recap, my argument was that your ideology is all fluff and no content, and is just so much back slapping. In an effort to prove me wrong, the presumed righteous fired back with 35 posts and counting of pure white noise, saying nothing, signifying nothing, meaning nothing, like 5% even funny, and a whole lot of…

haha really?

Your judgment means nothing to me, why would it? You've inserted yourself into a conversation to contribute zilch. Is that what you do all day when you're supposed to be working?

What are you even talking about? Office hours? Succeed at any of what?

You've got nothing to say, but a lot of different ways to say it!

Marxists are capable of defending a position.

It's a tremendous post and everyone's been telling me how great it is. What's even greater is the plainly obvious constitutional inability of liberals to defend their most beloved precepts.

At it again I see, Lyin' Motard?

you think you're baiting me into getting upset, proving who the real puppet master is, but I'm really just trying to bait you into saying something interesting.

good god are you always this bland?

And just to clarify, I was reading bell hooks back when you goobers were having your minds blown by Daria. But what does it matter? Have fun voting in Condoleeza over Ebeneezer, for """"justice"""".

"I've got full blown ego dystonia from having just some of the many absurd contradictions I entertain pointed out, better wheel out the psychoanalysis try deflect in a game of oneuppersonship, even though I'm conditi… highly educated in Objective Science which says Freud was wrong… oh no!"

Why use uncommon forms like faux-, asinine, modicum, befuddling, brevity and coherence, if your intent is illuminating the commoners? I don't think I claimed I was smart, why do you feel the need to assert your superior (judgment of) intellect?

Look at the very last part of that to get why I may have phrased it like that. Or do you deny that social justice is borne of academic texts and blogs that are all like this? Stylistic criticism is all surface, all appearance, which is precisely the point. I can count exactly one response in this whole thread that…

"Humanity is doomed" is a very chill idea lol. This monotonous defensiveness is practically alprazolam tho.

Bereft of the ability to cope with perceived criticism, you can only offer repetitive non-responses that amount to the claim that responding is beneath you.

"I'm actually extremely relaxed."