I never mentioned Benghazi or any similar attacks. I mentioned the email investigation, which yes, came up with multiple pieces of evidence that did prove her guilt, as confirmed by the FBI, and yet she somehow was given a pass. This has nothing to do with past or present investigations, fruitless or not. Or how many…

You response had nothing to do with what I said. At all.
But check out Obama without a teleprompter and you may want to rethink things. There are times when his uhs and ififififififififififif stuttering make it hard to follow what he's saying.
But I wasn't talking about that. Speech-making can be and is usually a…

There ARE legal pathways. Are you kidding? Yes it takes time but everyone is free to come here legally and become a citizen. Those ways you mention hasten the process and avoid taking the long way. I never said I was against immigration, only illegal immigration. And btw, I work in an industry in which I end up…

The investigations proved she lied. There is transcript and video evidence of her saying she did not do something and Comey saying they found she did do it. Amazing that there is anyone (and I know there are actually many!) out there that still won't admit it. Comey literally lists the statutes she violated, then says…

I'm talking about Trump bc you imply it is only the GOP does the scrutinizing; clearly the Dems do it too. And as Hillary showed us, they do a fair amount of skating as well.

It doesn't refute it; I agreed with it. Read more carefully. And I said yes, libs do the same thing. So what I'm saying is they both do it, so neither can accuse the other and then act innocent.

Ah, there it is. Again, bring up another Presidents perceived failures to cover your own President's. I am talking about NOW. About protecting us from a group that wants to kill us any way they can. You really can't compare anyway, bc this group is not confined to a country. They are all over the globe, and even on…

The comment was in response to the post before it calling her "sketchy" (which does indeed question her legality) and the joke which implied she came over illegally and found a rich guy to marry. But whatever, have a good night.

What? How do you take from my response that I am part of BLM? But since you brought it up, sure it's gone on before, but you can't deny it has ramped up and now he came very close to making it seem as though he's got their backs. That unless the police admit it's their fault, he understands why they're mad and it's ok…

I know. I'm the first person ever to fall victim to auto correct. How awful.

Great response…

"light stance". That's brilliant. He can't even name them Start by calling them out for who they are and what they do, and when they show up and kill people, bc that's all they want to do, is kill us infidels, stop putting the blame on guns.
Osama? I'm talking about what is going on NOW.
We voted against…

My response was about how she is the one who is unrestricted, even when violating statutes. How is that not related?
And when did I mention Benghazi? I'm talking about her emails/mishandling of classified info. I know it's hard, but try to keep her scandals straight.

I am not deflecting. I did not defend the plagiarism. I responded to a post that said citing previous instances of plagiarism doesn't excuse this one. I agree with that, but commented that it's funny that citing trumps lies seem to excuse hillarys.

Your reasoning as you call it, is anything but. You calling trump a sociopathic opportunist but not seeing that very same thing in Hillary is hilarious.
She is a proven liar, no matter which of several scandals involving her you want to reference. And just bc Repubs keep going after her doesn't make it a witchhunt…

First, I'm not defending Congress. I'm talking about Obama. The failures of Congress, on both sides, have nothing to do with failures of Obama's I'm talking about. His divisive speech, his lack of leadership, failure to call out and go after radical jihadists. Shoving a horrible healthcare reform down our throats,…

I'm not evading it. I'm responding to someone making a joke about her legal immigration. I never defended what she did concerning the speech. My posts have been in response to the joke, which I "got"; it just wasn't funny.

Hahaha yes bc trumps every move and word is not scrutinized. Cmon. And basically, a nominee signs up for that knowingly.
And trump doesn't have an FBI investigation in which it was proven he lied repeatedly on his record.
And it is unbelievable that you want to talk about anyone "skating by" after what Hillary got…

When you reply to MY post, silly me, I assume we are talking about the same "issue."

I "attacked" your comment that previous instances don't excuse this instance. I agree with that but that very thing is what libs do- accuse others of what they do, excuse themselves if they can find evidence that someone else did it too.