Especially since he's freaking 40, has talked about maybe retiring in a few years, and had an underwhelming opponent in last year's Mania. Who knows how many Mania's he got left, and WWE keeps wasting them with inferior opponents.
Especially since he's freaking 40, has talked about maybe retiring in a few years, and had an underwhelming opponent in last year's Mania. Who knows how many Mania's he got left, and WWE keeps wasting them with inferior opponents.
The problem is, Shane hasn't even had one DECENT match since he came back. That's what is puzzling me about this, people who say "well Shane can put on entertaining matches" or "this could end up stealing the show," etc. And my question is, what CURRENT evidence do we have to support that? Because it seems like people…
Yeah they set that up at the end of Luke Cage.
Or Claire as Misty and Colleen's resident nurse/buddy. Also Colleen continues to be the only new character that I'm really all that interested in.
Or maybe not sending him out there to get beaten/destroyed week after week. WWE may not get this, but that doesn't help get performers over most of the time. AT BEST, they remain the same, and in the case of a guy like Dolph Ziggler, it's killed their credibility.
Daniel Bryan was a fluke in that regard, but WWE…
So Sami has no momentum now. They do that whole thing about him sticking up for Foley, and then he just loses. It's frustrating being a Sami fan these days.
They sort of treat it like a joke now. For instance Nyssa mockingly referring to Thea as "sister in law" last season.
So basically he's Arrow-Bane from TDKR. Although hopefully done better here thn there (I didn't dislike TDKR, but they didn't handle Talia well).
Cisco being the comedy sidekick (but who's also useful as well), and Gypsy's boy toy=YES PLEASE!!
That's the problem, WHY? WHY is it ONLY her? WHY is it ONLY the female member who's powers make her crazy (and that's another problematic and overused trope in an of itself)? Why not Barry, why not Wally, why not Cisco, etc?
I'm getting sick of the show's having female characters be undercut because "they need protecting" or "it's for their own good. It's happened WAY too much on these shows. Heck it's what really annoys me about how they use Caitlin.
-They wasted no time getting rid of Jessie. Which is disappointing because I liked her and it makes her deciding to stay really pointless, TWO episodes later (face-palm). And she and Wally, were cute together. Just couldn't help yourselves could you showrunners (another face-palm).
Yeah but that ignores a bunch of context. It was his return to the company after being away for years, he had a good storyline (even if they bungled the ending later on) that instantly made him the babyface. He was facing the Undertaker at Mania which always gets a big pop, and the roster was decimated by injuries/a…
Sorry SD, still don't give a crap about AJ vs. Shane. It's a complete and utter waste of the AJ's talents and he deserves far better. I guess for the first time ever, an AJ Styles match will be my pee break opportunity, pity.
Everyone expects either Bayley or Charlotte to win. So yeah, it would be a surprise for many if it was Sasha instead.
Turning Bayley heel would be a horrible idea.
It's still the main event, and it still shows you what WWE truly puts value on. These old part-time nostalgia acts are more important, and get the top spots on the biggest stage, over the full-timers who they should be building up. And AJ, who was the MVP of the company last year, gets stuck trying to carry a…
Yeah it's really stupid.
Asuka should go to SD (also she's been working SD house shows recently). They need her more. Also Raw cannot get ALL of the top NXT call-ups.
Amen to that. She's awful.