True, but if I gotta put my faith in one guy to kick ass and save the universe, it'll the the jacked bald guy, not the skinny, J-pop boyband reject.

I ain't played Danganropa, but Persona is very low on 'Anime Bullshit'. It has relationships without having creepy fanservice or reducing characters to the same anime archetypes of tsundere, yandere, childhood friend etc. It punishes the player for pursuing a harem of girls because they are characters and not empty…

Subtitles?

That's how all Englishmen looked back then. Even the rich ones.

'The genre of this show is supposed to be mystery'

I quite enjoyed the episode. I've got a few observations, but if I had to grade it, I'd maybe give it a B.

Pretty much all Sherlock stories and adaptations after Doyle are fanfiction.

FMA could work.

Had Eurus manipulated perhaps a few targeted individuals over a long period of time, it would have been believable. But the whole 'get anyone to do anything with one conversation' is completely at odds with reality.

I think that's a supervillain.

I've just watched it, and I have to say that The Final Problem's is kind of like a terminus of all of Sherlock's flaws. Primarily, Sherlock feels like fanfiction.

I don't think it was quite that bad, but, then again I am quite lenient when it comes to episode 1/ the pilot. Sure, it was secretive, but that's to be expected, to be honest. A lot was set up (the land, EIC plotting, the sister, his son, what happened in Africa?) and as long as the show doesn't take too long to get…

From Twitter? No.

I never meant to suggest that counter-citation is the only strategy you should use in an argument. Discussions aren't a game of 'who can cite the most' but rather who can use the right evidence to support their argument. If your opponent is just someone who cites any old garbage, then say so, and why. Of course, this…

How? The entire article is about how difficult it is to convince the other party because any facts you present to them will be ignored or wrongly interpreted to support their worldview. In other words, it's basically pointless to try to convince the other person.

This is how I see internet discussions: if I'm arguing, I try to be open minded, I try to avoid certainty and I try to honestly listen and engage with arguments. But, sometimes people make arguments with no basis in facts or reality and you don't have to respect someone like that: destroy them, no mercy.

I absolutely agree with your point about NXT no longer being able to develop homegrown stars - I've been tooting that horn for, like, a year. NXT has a kind of identity problem, it doesn't know if it wants to be the equivalent of the under-18s or a championship side. Of course the signing of experienced guys is done…

Oh, I'm no Hillary Stan. I'm not even American. And I don't think it's really sensible to blame anyone but the candidates and their campaign team for why their side lost.

The WWE is never going to be transparent about its costs. It has VKM's 'billionaire' status to protect.

The issue isn't about the whiteness of the candidates, and making the point that Hillary is also white is exactly the kind of thinking that lost the black liberal vote for Bernie. The point is that black liberals are different to white liberals and desire different things: focussing your campaign on white liberals and…