the worst part of the movie is when you hear de niro mumbling about how he vaguely remembers being in a much better boxing movie, and then everyone gets real quiet.

i can't stop having random mackenzie davis/mary elizabeth winstead fantasy's.

not sure that's a fair representation of mike rowe.

there aren't many slavish conservatives or liberals that offer much to listen to anymore. the people worth talking and listening to are the ones who, no matter how left or right they might lean, actually take a deep breath and think about the question and can admit their side might be flawed. mclaughlin epitomized all…

it's the oldest trick in the book. offer someone millions of dollars and watch them cash the check.

yes, but when they wake up and can't remember the night before, what shenanigans ensue?

kind of impressive how the article assumes he has to prove he's not "one of them".

i wanted to see it until av club told me it had "something to say".

i generally come down in favor of more anna kendrick. if she wants to be a squirrel or whatever it is, that can't be a bad thing for america.

yeah, hollywood is plenty sexist of course, but if people didn't want to sleep with her, she wouldn't be a star. that's not to say she has no talent, but simply that she doesn't have enough to explain why we know her name as much as we do. then again, sometimes actresses have to play the sex symbol before they can be…

it's always convenient when you get a reaction that proves your premise in the first place.

it was what i expected….a mostlywell made movie, but it wasn't made because they came up with another great story. they came up with a story that justified them continuing the series. so even though it was made well, it felt empty in the end.

i will see this regardless, but everytime i see the previews, it appears to me they were searching for a reason to do another film and just finally said, "screw it, let's say he's avenging his father. people love that". the previews seem to be less of an effort to sell you on what's good about this movie and more of a…

i just know that lena dunham's speech made me hungry for sushi.

seeing emily sacrifice her suitor/stalker was perhaps the sexiest thing i've seen on tv in a while.

because the movement is simply an argument in progress. in order to win the argument you have to convince the other side, and if they see violence or hate coming from those shouting the slogan you're shouting, you have to explain to them why that's not what you're all about. i'm not suggesting black lives matter is…

who among us hasn't found schindler's list erotic at one time or another?

for me it will always be known as wednseday.

"Still, televised punditry is a form of entertainment…"

there's a genuine difference between a tv show telling a story that includes politics and being political with their storytelling. i would suggest the problem starts with too much of the latter and not enough of the former.