Weird question to ask. Uhh, no, it's not sexist to have a movie that's centered around guys if that's specific to the time period or location. What is sexist is that most movies are about men for no good reason.

The movie had a big following on Tumblr and Mako Mori was really popular. They even named a race and feminist based critique test after her.

No.

Problematic is a placeholder word. Be specific afterwards or don't use it at all.

I've yet to find a single thing I disagree with Lindsay Ellis on. She seems to really cut to the heart of the matter every time.

It's an old article by I just can't help myself. These are nitpicks that don't address the excellent overarching point of the article, BUT
With nerdy regards Mad Max:

Reeves always looks like he's been plucked straight out of some stylized comic book, he's so straight up and down, and long in the body, so weirdly… symmetrical. It gives him this otherworldly quality that makes his unnatural way of delivering lines seem very natural for him. He has that very quiet menace to him in…

See also Marvelverse and soon-to-be Ghost in the Shell.

I'm sure many a pretty actress has been told that. The smart ones don't listen. You got your Lupita NyongOs, Emma Stones, Anne Hathaways, Charlize Therons, Anya Taylor-Joys, Natalie Portmans.
ScarJo's style is pretty standard blank, that's all. I find it funny that people ragged on Kristen Stewart for being so deadpan…

It's more like the ones who look like they're defying age have had good plastic surgery / cosmetic procedures. The one's who look like they've had work done have usually had bad work done. That stuff is like dying your hair in Hollywood, everyone does it.

Seems like, if you're a reasonably hot Australian, preferably blonde (or in the case of Robbie, who is a dark brunette, can keep dying your hair blonde) and can do a passable American accent you're basically golden in Hollywood for as long as you can maintain your looks.

It's the golden light at the end of the tunnel. Our big reward for fighting our way through the abyss that has been 2016.

I think it's a combo of reasons.
1) She had time in her schedule open up while they're gender-flipping that script for the was-going-to-be-Brad-Pitt movie for her, so why not earn $15mill while she chills
2) She's already worked with both the director, F Gary Gray, and Jason Statham on The Italian Job, so it's kind of a…

To be fair, it's more a sort of heads up for the big event screening they're having for the trailer in Times Square, NYC this Sunday. They're hijacking all the electronic billboards and doing like an entire cast event thingy.

I can't imagine a year we have needed a Fast and Furious movie more. The title signals it will be exactly the healing balm I was hoping and praying it would be.

I KNOW! Just look at this mess!!

Oh Charlize, mon chéri. How does she manage to look so damn dignified in a Fast and Furious movie, and while wearing a Metallica tee? I don't know, but her styling at least is A++ and she just looks fucking cool. I think on anyone else, that get-up would have looked like a costume, but she's wearing the heck out of it.

Every time I see Gillian Jacobs now I just 1) Wish Suicide Squad wasn't a flaming bag of feces. And 2) That Jacobs had been cast as Harley Quinn. She would have been so perfect.

Where did the rest of this feminism/social justice hatred come from though? I used to listen these Youtube atheist types speak so much sense on so many things, then all of a sudden it was like a switch got flipped and they all turned into the kind of logicless tinfoil hat wearers they were mocking. Now they're all "No…

How the hell did that happen??