I am sure all options were considered, since they reversed 20 episodes of James/Kara in one fell swoop with this episode and that is some major plot cleaning up. I am guessing even if they did that, it would lead to the same place and would also be clunky so maybe they thought, "why don't we just rip the band aid off…

As others stated, that relationship was bland and they had zero chemistry and most people didn't care for it. He was too laid back and bland and he was mainly used as a guy in distress. He had one episode total where his reporter chops were actually used as part of a plot. They "ripped the band aid off" rather than…

meh, the problem was all last season they set HER up as the giddy one with James, not the other way around. So for her to suddenly decide to end it was clunky as hell. But I am happy as that "relationship" was just inert from the get go.

he was really good and hope he stays at least as a permanent cameo type of role, but I did think he was a little too young considering he is supposed to be over 12 years older then her..and yes, his explanation that Kryptonians age slowly was pretty clunky and contrived. But other than that, he was great.

Her "reason" for ending it with James was almost a meta moment for why the show needed to end it. She is too young and chipper to be saddled with the "he's the one!" storyline they forced last season. Especially someone so serious and bland. Supergirl needs to develop Kara and the characters better, then have her…

I think James is also thinking, why couldn't I have gotten myself some Supergirl last season before everyone figured out I had to go..LOL

meh, TBBT is sooo over and the cast is coasting and cashing checks

It was very good. Maybe needed a two hour premiere on this network to really cement all the changes, but that is nitpicky. I also really admired its ability to change the main relationship dynamics, although I agree it was very clunky with James/Kara. His character and how he plays him was just not gelling with the…

nutter. People can allege anything they want in a complaint. NO ONE was backed up this insane person and her case has been thrown out multiple times. Again, Ivana has retracted the claim and endorsed him. You are just nuts

yawn

seriously, you are an idiot

yawn

oh, my god, he kissed a woman! How will she ever live with the eternal shame! Ivana disavowed decades ago. The NYT was widely laughed at as every woman said they lied about what they said and they like Trump. Same with 100's of beauty contestants. The Mars a Lago thing was also debunked. She made it up at the…

There are no "witnesses" nutter. And yes, she did disavow it. You are talking out of your butt to make a phony point.

You are getting a lot from a short recorded private conversation. Saying something is not proof you did it to some women where it was unwanted. If women come forward saying it happened to them,then you will have a point.

You think it is a stretch is again what is funny. This happens ALL THE TIME and has forever

How many didn't and willingly slept with these guys..probably lots

again, what evidence is there that it was unwanted by the women? Its only assault if it is unwanted and we have no idea whom he was referring to and if it was unwanted. You are assuming it was with no evidence. He is a billionaire, you really think there are not women who went out or screwed him after he did that?…

Everytime someone acts with outrage about how easy it is and how crude some famous guys are about getting women is the funny thing. Has no one seen movies about rock stars and movie stars before 2016? From Brett Favre to Hugh Hefner to Anthony Weiner to now Trump (and countless others), people are "shocked" at their…

The child rape thing is a nutter and frivolous and his ex wife was not raped, she disavowed it decades ago as they were in a nasty divorce. She endorsed him for president. Every landlord 40 years ago was sued for rental discrimination in NYC..it was settled with no admission or finding of wrongdoing.