disqusdvcl9jtdl4--disqus
Chapman Baxter
disqusdvcl9jtdl4--disqus

Sounds like typical Stone and Parker to me. Going after liberals rather than right-wing bigots/trigger-happy racists. Even though I'm not the biggest fan of Champagne Socialists or whatever the US equivalent is, I think it's rather a false equivalency when Stone and Parker go after them with the same, or even more,

To be fair, ignoring a phone-call from Maggie Thatcher to have sex demonstrated that Bond had his priorities right.

And in that same goddamn film Bond kills a man in wheelchair by dropping him, via helicopter, into an industrial chimney.

I've heard it, reasonably, argued that Connery wouldn't have been able to pull off a Bond that cries.

And "We Have All the Time in the World".

Seriously, is there anyone here who would rather see Trump as president before Kevin James?

I don't think the word 'better' can be applied when discussing the differences between sex offenders. But arguably what Saville did is even 'worse' bearing in mind the extent of his crimes and the fact that he actually committed multiple rapes. But these men are all scum and where sex offences are concerned there

I didn't mention Harris only because as disgusting, and admittedly surprising, as his offences were, they weren't anywhere near on the scale or extremity of what Jimmy Saville committed. I'm certainly not trying to minimise the things Harris did, but my understanding is that whilst he committed various sexual

As disgusting as these revelations concerning Cosby are, particularly bearing in mind his jolly, family-friendly public persona, the sad fact is that it's not too difficult for those of us in the UK to believe how Cosby could have got away with such crimes. In the UK, Jimmy Saville, another popular 'family'

Let's just call it 'The Huxtables', a progressive mid-80s show about a professional single mother and her kids.

I think Judd Apatow just showed everyone why he quit stand-up the first time round.

You know what? I was confused because when you referred to 'Mr. Bill' I thought you were actually referring to Bill Murray, which is why I assumed you hated everything that came after the original 'Not Ready for Prime Time Players' (Aykroyd, Belushi, Chase, Curtin, Morris, Newman and Radner).

It all depends on whether or not it was Rob Schneider's choice to not appear in 'Grown-Ups 2'.

Apparently it takes an elitist to elevate the fine art of Chevy Chase and the late John Belushi above all other comedians.

I hope now I've explained it to you you'll not be deterred from visiting. I mean you still might not like the site and thus be unwilling to visit, but hopefully it won't be because of any navigational issues.

There are new reviews on the side panel every day, but Monday is always old releases being released on home video format. But Tuesday to Thursday features reviews for new theatrical release with the bigger films featuring towards the later parts of the week. It makes sense since most theatrical releases take place

But you know where to look now, right? Besides, I like the tidiness. The newsfeeds, which tend to generate the most instant traffic, have pride of place but the featured articles are placed in a section just below and often involve more thoughtful, intense discussion.

If you give it a few seconds the white dotted squares should disappear and a thumbnail will appear in its place. To me the typeface looks quite classy and ye background colour is white, as it is here. When you visit the site what are you looking for, because from my perspective it's quite easy to navigate and less

There's room there for both. And where do you get off calling him an 'asshole'?

Hoho. 'cept it isn't a flop and Nathan isn't that petty.