disqusay9ggs5woe--disqus
Simon
disqusay9ggs5woe--disqus

Patti Mayonnaise is already a lesbian icon

No denying he is handsomely compensated, I just think its cool that he's not going the "I'm a serious actor now" route.

I wish Sutter had just adapted the First Law trilogy instead

Bradley Cooper seems like a cool guy. He's been nominated for three oscars in a row, but he still makes room to do Wet Hot American Summer and not only produce but appear in a few episodes of a CBS procedural based off one of his movies that made for a particularly hilarious episode of the Flophouse.

thank you

is this what they refer to in the biz as pilot season? am i using that term correctly?

I thought the movie was funny, but I would have enjoyed it more if they had cut out the whole running gag of each character literally announcing what trope they represented.

These kinds of discussions are always facilitated by a proffer, where both sides agree to hear what the other has to say with none of it leaving the room. Like a reporter getting a quote off the record. The weirdest thing to me professionally about Law and Order was how often they were still figuring out often times

I thought we had buried this argument sometime around 1997

Is the bible considered an existing property? Wondering how to place Exodus

I was curious if this is correct and did a little research. I believe Salt, Unstoppable, Knight and Day, Elysium, White House Down, After Earth, and this year's San Andreas would qualify.

"From the guy that brought you Men Who Stare at Goats" does not inspire much confidence

Old Boy. Saw it on DVD in a college dorm the year it debuted at Cannes, had heard nothing of any buzz or was even aware there was a "twist." Friend just described it as a "great revenge thriller."

Yes

That would make for a killer article. Hal Hartley is another one that comes to mind from that scene, as well as Larry Clark and Harmony Korine. The last one in the style I can remember is 2001's L.I.E

Dowd is a stud

Who hates Scream?

That would actually be a cool twist in the world of a fictional television show. It kind of gets to what I was saying, the people who would be hurt the most by Elliot's attack would be the people whose savings were wiped out. Hopefully that isn't too controversial point here: if a bank controls 70% of america's

I think we're coming at this from two opposite ends of the spectrum, so a meaningful debate is probably not likely to take place. I am going to try and approach this from as simplified an angle as possible, and ask, do you have a substantial savings account, and, if you do, what do you think happens to the money in

The government wouldn't be able to step in and "give the banks back the money" and make everything okay. That debt represents a much, much larger investment; shifting debt around is the only reason banks exist. For instance, the money in your checking account right now is probably being used to give some guy a car