disqus6tn3fl7sji--disqus
Alvin Holler
disqus6tn3fl7sji--disqus

In fact the more I think about it the more I like Archie as the real killer. Kitty cloned him using Sherlock's hair and an advanced technique she picked up after her return to London. Archie is even more precocious than Sherlock and is colluding with the Nanny who is carrying out his orders. The murders are part of an

I don't know whether Sherlock will turn out to know or even potentially be the father but Kitty's spiel about the supportive but absent father felt like the writers laying the groundwork for the father to become an issue in the next episode. We'll probably find out after Archie's kidnap and the race against time to

Could that be related to her accent rather than her diction? I only ask as I'm British and I don't have any problem understanding her.

I think Milo is a different animal and I also think the US media dropped the ball where covering Trump was concerned. One person who didn't by the way is Bill Maher who was making great efforts to punch through the complacency in Democratic circles when Clinton was way ahead in the polling.

Ah but reading further it looks like other comments also got flagged and their authors are unlikely to be as ham-fisted as myself.

Maybe it auto flagged me for my appalling spelling! I really should have atheist down by now…

I don't know whether this is actually the case, but I think I may have inadvertently triggered the flag. I opened a second window when I wrote the comment as I wanted to refer back to the article. Later sometime after posting I used the second window to browse elsewhere on AV club and I wonder if it somehow

It reads like something Salon turned down as too vapid. It's depressing to see it appear on this site which normally sets the bar a lot higher.

I think this: 'He's one of those people who's somewhat intelligent, but extremely gullible' is fair comment and I'll concede the smarminess as well, albeit I think some of it at least is part of his schtick.

I'm surprised and somewhat disappointed more people haven't commented on that sentence. I found it a little disturbing and deeply problematic, it's the kind of thing I've started to become used to seeing at some sites but not here.

The take down articles are precisely what Milo and his ilk thrive on.

Funnily enough one of the things I like about him is that he's remained a working comic, despite the big paycheck he's spending his weekends still doing the clubs and at least attempting to keep his act fresh and relevant. So whilst I understand you may not have enjoyed the gig, I prefer his approach to that of other

I think I may actually be to blame for the awaiting moderation thing, I opened a second window and I think that somehow I wound up resubmitting my original comment which was still sat on the new window, which wasn't my intention :(

I do and indeed did, just as I celebrate Maher for consistently providing a platform via his show to a diverse selection of activists, commentators and personalities to discuss global events.

Thank you.

I think he maybe could've done better, although as the host perhaps his inclination is to leave the outright confrontation to the guests? I think the author of the article has misunderstood completely Maher;s chiding of the audience by the way, I think he was exposing Milo's modus operandi when he did that. Still,

Can you please define what you mean by progressive and liberal?

Zachary each and any of those things can be debated and we'd probably have some agreement on Maher's positions on certain issues, but your own and others underlying impulse to disqualify people you disagree with from the debate is corrosive and profoundly illiberal and in my view more harmful than the issues you flag.

I think you've misunderstood the role of the host and the guest in this format.

I don't think the Good Place is really the 'Good Place'. Even characters like Chidi or Tahani who aren't, presumably, there by mistake are slowly having their flaws revealed. Tahani's self obession with the neigbourhood rankings doesn't correspond to someone as selfless as she purports to be for instance and in this