disqus6l0ktwn09v--disqus
Derpacleese
disqus6l0ktwn09v--disqus

That's 100% true…but the pumpkin wouldn't have come CLOSE if not for disaffected white people. Calling them all angry racists is ignorant.

Joke about these people at your own expense. This is how the pumpkin got elected.

Problem is that the pumpkin's support among his base AND Republicans writ large is VERY strong.

Carry on then…I guess.

In all seriousness, this is Charlie Manson all over again. (Except nobody has killed anyone — that we know of — yet).

"[A] former academic" — as in he used to…academe?

There's a ballsy/eunuch joke somewhere, I just can't quite find it…

Yes, the immortal words of Louise Guzman…the first person to suggest that they don't negotiate with terrorists.

As much as he's a cipher of a character, he does serve some important purposes — 1) acts as a foil to Sam (in the broad sense); 2-5) shows the power House Lannister still wields; 6) is a dick that we will all be happy to see die (presuming it wasn't him jamming his face in the river).

That's a valid point, but considering Vegas DOES take odds on who's going to die, and the article involves a Vegas oddsmaker…seeing Randall and Dickon (hehehe) at 6 and 8 to 1 respectively suggests that they're alive (otherwise the odds would be lower, and that's kinda the thing).

I'm actually, honestly curious — does it take more or less time for you to type "b/c" versus "because"

I think the little hints of a sexy, cave-filled future between Jon and Dany are just the showrunners fucking with us — Jon said it himself — there's no time for that.

If this is tacit confirmation that both Tarlys are alive, this article should probably have a spoiler tag.

That might be the deepest Neil Breen commentary ever. At one sentence a-piece, it's a perfect encapsulation of what the Breen-iac should anticipate.

There is, and it's called "The Room"

Sorry, I thought I had said…it's the "Loot Train Battle"

Yeah, as far as production is concerned. Mine is better though ;)

A very key reason that China has allowed the Kims to do as they please is precisely because of the threat of the refugees you mention. They haven't simply dealt with Korea the same they have with Tibet or Taiwan because of American (and Japanese, sort of…, and Russian) influence.

Curious about your source on Russian investment (to better inform myself)…